Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Prognostic Significance of the Mitral L-Wave in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Prognostic Significance of the Mitral L-Wave in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Do you wish to request the book?
Prognostic Significance of the Mitral L-Wave in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Prognostic Significance of the Mitral L-Wave in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
2020
Overview
A mitral L-wave indicates advanced diastolic dysfunction with elevated left ventricular filling pressure. Previous studies have reported that the presence of a mitral L-wave is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with heart failure. However, whether the L-wave can predict adverse events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of a mitral L-wave in patients with HC, and the prognosis of patients with or without an L-wave. We analyzed 445 patients with HC. The end points of this study were HC-related death, such as sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events, heart failure-related death, and stroke-related death. A mitral L-wave was defined as a distinct mid-diastolic flow velocity after the E wave with a peak velocity >20 cm/s. The prevalence of an L-wave was 32.4% in patients with HC. Patients with an L-wave were significantly younger, more likely to be women, had higher New York Heart Association functional class, and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation than did patients without an L-wave. Patients with an L-wave had a significantly higher incidence of HC-related death compared with those without an L-wave (log-rank, p < 0.001). The L-wave was an independent determinant of HC-related death in multivariate analysis adjusted for imbalanced baseline variables (adjusted hazard ratio 2.38; 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 4.01; p = 0.001). In conclusion, the presence of a mitral L-wave may be associated with adverse outcome in patients with HC.
