Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) in Chinese samples
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) in Chinese samples
Do you wish to request the book?
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) in Chinese samples
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) in Chinese samples
2024
Overview
To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (C-MPFI) in college students and other groups. A total of 2794 participants were included in the study, including college students (Sample A:
N
= 1405), middle school students (Sample B:
N
= 438), epidemic prevention and control volunteers (Sample C:
N
= 496), and private enterprise employees (Sample D:
N
= 455). Sample A was asked to complete C-MPFI and the validity questionnaires at the same time. Other sample groups were only required to complete C-MPFI. After 3 weeks, 355 college students filled in the same questionnaires to assess the test-retest reliability. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the C-MPFI consisted of six factors, with a total of 30 items. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the six-factor structure fit was acceptable (
χ
2
= 1629.64,
df
= 398, CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.070, SRMR = 0.078). C-MPFI and its dimensions are significantly positively correlated with positive indicators of mental health (life satisfaction), significantly negatively correlated with negative emotions (depression, anxiety, stress), and significantly negatively correlated with empirical avoidance and cognitive fusion. C-MPFI and its dimensions demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability in different samples. The C-MPFI scores were comparable across groups, according to the results of the measurement invariance tests, the configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance, and strict invariance of the 6-factor model. It suggested that the C-MPFI has good reliability and validity.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
