Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Behavioral Selection of Coprophagy in an Arid‐Adapted Herbivore: Does a Compatibility–Risk Gradient Shape Selective Coprophagy?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Behavioral Selection of Coprophagy in an Arid‐Adapted Herbivore: Does a Compatibility–Risk Gradient Shape Selective Coprophagy?
Do you wish to request the book?
Behavioral Selection of Coprophagy in an Arid‐Adapted Herbivore: Does a Compatibility–Risk Gradient Shape Selective Coprophagy?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Behavioral Selection of Coprophagy in an Arid‐Adapted Herbivore: Does a Compatibility–Risk Gradient Shape Selective Coprophagy?
2026
Overview
Coprophagy is widespread among herbivores but remains poorly understood in reptiles, where its ecological function has rarely been tested. We conducted controlled choice experiments with 25 adult Texas tortoises ( Gopherus berlandieri ), an arid‐adapted hindgut fermenter, to determine whether feces consumption represents incidental ingestion or a selective behavioral strategy. Each tortoise was presented with six feces types representing self, conspecific, and heterospecific sources (feral hog ( Sus scrofa ), raccoon ( Procyon lotor ), coyote ( Canis latrans ), and nilgai ( Boselaphus tragocamelus )). Coprophagy occurred in 96% of individuals, and both the probability and relative amount of consumption differed significantly among feces types. Tortoises showed a consistent preference hierarchy (e.g., self, conspecific, feral hog, raccoon, coyote, nilgai), providing evidence for a compatibility–risk gradient in which individuals favored feces most similar in dietary composition and microbial origin while avoiding those likely to pose digestive or pathogenic risk. These patterns suggest that coprophagy serves as a behavioral mechanism of nutrient recapture and microbial maintenance, sustaining fermentation efficiency in environments where microbial reservoirs are ephemeral. By selectively regulating microbial exposure, tortoises mitigate ecological constraints imposed by aridity and low nutrient availability. Our findings identify selective coprophagy as an adaptive behavior that links individual physiology with nutrient and microbial cycling in arid ecosystems, illustrating how behavioral flexibility promotes persistence in long‐lived vertebrates inhabiting resource‐limited environments.
