Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Survival Impact of Locoregional Treatment of the Primary Tumor in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancers in a Large Multicentric Cohort Study: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Survival Impact of Locoregional Treatment of the Primary Tumor in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancers in a Large Multicentric Cohort Study: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Survival Impact of Locoregional Treatment of the Primary Tumor in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancers in a Large Multicentric Cohort Study: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Survival Impact of Locoregional Treatment of the Primary Tumor in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancers in a Large Multicentric Cohort Study: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
2019
Overview
Introduction
Improvement in overall survival (OS) by locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients remains controversial.
Objective
The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of LRT on OS in a large retrospective cohort of de novo MBC patients, with regard to immunohistochemical characteristics and pattern of metastatic dissemination.
Methods
We conducted a multicentric retrospective study of patients diagnosed with de novo MBC selected from the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics MBC database (NCT03275311) between 2008 and 2014. Overall, 4276 women were included in the study. LRT comprised either radiotherapy, surgery, or both.
Results
LRT was used in 40% of patients. Compared with no LRT, patients who received LRT were younger (
p
< 0.0001) and were more likely to have only one metastatic site (
p
< 0.0001) or bone-only metastases (
p
< 0.0001). LRT was associated with a significantly better OS based on landmark multivariate analysis at 1-year (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.76,
p
< 0.001). Similar results were observed in all sensitivity analyses, including propensity score matching. In subgroup analysis, LRT was associated with better OS in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (61.6 vs. 45.9 months,
p
< 0.001) and HER2-positive tumors (77.2 vs. 52.6 months,
p
= 0.008), but not in triple-negative tumors (19 vs. 18.6 months,
p
= 0.54), and was also associated with a reduction in the risk of death in visceral metastatic patients (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
LRT was associated with a significantly better OS in de novo MBC patients, including patients with visceral involvement at diagnosis; however, LRT did not impact OS in triple-negative MBC.
