Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record-Embedded Refeeding Risk Order Set and Its Impact on Refeeding Syndrome Among Adults Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Inpatient Hospital Setting
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record-Embedded Refeeding Risk Order Set and Its Impact on Refeeding Syndrome Among Adults Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Inpatient Hospital Setting
Do you wish to request the book?
Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record-Embedded Refeeding Risk Order Set and Its Impact on Refeeding Syndrome Among Adults Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Inpatient Hospital Setting
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record-Embedded Refeeding Risk Order Set and Its Impact on Refeeding Syndrome Among Adults Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Inpatient Hospital Setting
2026
Overview
Background/Objectives: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is challenging to prevent and manage in hospitalized patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN). Nebraska Medicine implemented an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Refeeding Risk Order Set (RROS) to standardize prevention measures, including structured electrolyte monitoring, thiamine supplementation, and conservative EN initiation. This study evaluated whether RROS implementation reduced RFS occurrence or severity and assessed its operational impact. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adults receiving EN before and after RROS implementation were compared. Primary outcomes were RFS occurrence and severity; secondary outcomes included EN initiation and advancement rates, electrolyte trends, lab frequency, and electrolyte repletion. Results: RFS occurrence did not differ significantly between groups (92.3% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.694), nor did severity (p = 0.535). The post-RROS group received more electrolyte boluses on EN Day 0 (p = 0.027) and had a lower EN starting rate (15.7 vs. 18.3 mL/h, p = 0.045). Conclusions: Although the RROS did not reduce RFS occurrence or severity, integrating American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)-based guidance into the EMR was highly feasible and adopted immediately. Automating electrolyte monitoring, micronutrient supplementation, and conservative feeding initiation reduces the risk of errors and promotes consistent care. These benefits improve workflow efficiency and support providers during high census periods, limited staffing, or when experience varies. Future research should explore combining EMR tools with predictive analytics to optimize early risk identification and individualized management.
Publisher
MDPI AG,Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
