Journal Article

Efficacy of Greater Occipital Nerve Blockade in Craniofacial Neuralgia and Facial Pain Syndromes: A Retrospective Chart Review with Prospectively Collected Follow-Up Data

Ozge, Aynur, Poyraz, Turan

2025

Overview

Background/Objectives: Greater occipital nerve blockade (GONB) is a minimally invasive intervention used to treat primary headaches. However, the evidence regarding its role in craniofacial pain syndromes and its potential impact on analgesic use remains limited. Previous studies have reported that GONB is an effective method in patients with cranial neuralgia, but its efficacy is limited in persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP). Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort trial examining the medical records of 26 patients who applied to our Headache Clinic due to facial pain and cranial neuralgia between April 2023 and April 2025. Of these patients, 12 were trigeminal neuralgia (46%), 6 were occipital neuralgia (23%), 4 were trigeminal neuropathic pain (15%), and 4 were PIFP (15%) patients. In our study, the landmark-based GONB technique was used to determine the greatest tenderness to palpation (TTP) area. A standard 2.5 mL mixture of 30 mg 2% lidocaine and 4 mg dexamethasone was injected bilaterally as a single dose into the nerve region of all patients. After GONB, all patients were routinely contacted by phone or addressed face to face once a week for the first month and monthly thereafter, and medical changes were recorded with a standard-case follow-up form file. The case follow-up form allowed regular monitoring of parameters, such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), self-assessment scales for patients’ clinical responses, sensitivity to triggers, possible side effects, duration of effect, and the number of analgesics used. Results: A positive response with at least 50% overall improvement compared to the patient’s baseline level was found in 22 of 26 patients. Response to treatment was observed in 10 patients in the trigeminal neuralgia group (83%), 3 patients in the trigeminal neuropathic pain (75%) and PIFP groups (75%), and all in the occipital neuralgia group (100%). There was no statistically significant difference in response rates between the diagnostic groups. A significant difference was found in terms of response rates according to gender (p = 0.022). Accordingly, while response was observed in all 15 female patients, response was observed in 7 of 11 male patients (64%). Pre-GONB VAS values of those responding to treatment were found to be higher. Patients with positive responses to GONB had a significantly higher median value of the VAS total score (5; 95% CI: 1.83–4.52) in comparison to those with negative responses (8.32; 95% CI: 8.17–12.12) (p < 0.001). Post-GONB Intensity (VAS) and Post-GONB sensitivity to triggers decreased significantly (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). In those who responded, the decrease in analgesic use after GONB compared to before was statistically significant in the first and second months (p < 0.001, p < 0.003, respectively). Although the decrease continued in the third month, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.551). Conclusions: GONB reduces the duration, frequency, and intensity of headaches, and the need for acute analgesic use in CN and PIFP patients.

• Publisher: MDPI AG,MDPI
• Subject: Analgesics / Care and treatment / Cohort analysis / Diagnosis / Headache / Headaches / Migraine / Nerve block / Neuralgia / Pain / Patient outcomes