Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Is Smarter Better? A Moral Judgment Perspective on Consumer Attitudes about Different Types of AI Services
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Is Smarter Better? A Moral Judgment Perspective on Consumer Attitudes about Different Types of AI Services
Do you wish to request the book?
Is Smarter Better? A Moral Judgment Perspective on Consumer Attitudes about Different Types of AI Services
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Is Smarter Better? A Moral Judgment Perspective on Consumer Attitudes about Different Types of AI Services
2024
Overview
AI is considered a key driver of industrial transformation and a strategic technology that will shape future development. With AI services continuing to permeate various sectors, concerns have emerged about the ethics of AI. This study investigates the effects of different types of AI services (mechanical, thinking, and affective AI services) on consumers’ attitudes through offline and online AI service experiments. We also construct a model to explore the mediating roles of identity threat and perceived control. The findings reveal that mechanical AI services negatively affect consumers’ attitudes while thinking and affective AI services have a positive effect. Additionally, we explore how consumers’ attitudes vary across different service scenarios and ethical judgments (utilitarianism and deontology). Our findings could offer practical guidance for enterprises providing AI services.
Publisher
MDPI AG
