Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The ultrasonographic “whirlpool sign” in testicular torsion: valuable tool or waste of valuable time? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The ultrasonographic “whirlpool sign” in testicular torsion: valuable tool or waste of valuable time? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
The ultrasonographic “whirlpool sign” in testicular torsion: valuable tool or waste of valuable time? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The ultrasonographic “whirlpool sign” in testicular torsion: valuable tool or waste of valuable time? A systematic review and meta-analysis
2018
Overview
PurposeA positive whirlpool sign (WS) is defined as the presence of a spiral-like pattern when the spermatic cord is assessed during ultrasonography (US), using standard, high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) and/or color Doppler sonography (CDS), in the presence of testicular torsion. The objective of this review was to assess the validity and accuracy of this sign by performing a comprehensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis.MethodsIn accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed (August, 2017), using the following databases: BMJ Best Practice, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Selected studies were further assessed for relevance and quality using the Oxford 2010 Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP).ResultsOf the studies assessed, a total of 723 participants were included, with a mean of 72.3 (SD 71.9) participants. Of the participants, 226 (31.3%) were diagnosed with testicular torsion (TT). Meta-analysis of the studies that provided sufficient data resulted in a pooled sensitivity and specificity of the WS of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65–0.79) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.92–0.99), respectively. Removal of all neonates increased the pooled sensitivity to 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.98) while the pooled specificity remained almost unchanged at 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95–1.00). The estimated summary effect of all studies with sufficient data was 4.34 (95% CI, 1.01–7.67; n = 394; p = 0.001). A large degree of heterogeneity was suggested by an I2 statistic of 88.27% (95% CI, 68.60–98.68%). Removal of neonatal subjects increased the estimated summary effect to 5.32 (95% CI, 1.59–9.05; n = 375; p = 0.001).ConclusionThe WS, when correctly diagnosed, may be viewed as a very definitive sign for TT in the pediatric and adult populations. However, its role in neonates is limited.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
