Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Parameters of Instrumental Swallowing Evaluations: Describing a Diagnostic Dilemma
by
Langmore, Susan E.
, Pisegna, Jessica M.
in
Adult
/ Barium Sulfate
/ Clinical Competence
/ Costs (Law)
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Deglutition - physiology
/ Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Endoscopy - methods
/ Female
/ Fluoroscopy - methods
/ Gastroenterology
/ Hepatology
/ Humans
/ Imaging
/ Larynx - diagnostic imaging
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Middle Aged
/ Mortgage-backed securities
/ Original Article
/ Otorhinolaryngology
/ Pharynx - diagnostic imaging
/ Radiology
/ Random Allocation
/ Severity of Illness Index
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ Symptom Assessment - methods
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Parameters of Instrumental Swallowing Evaluations: Describing a Diagnostic Dilemma
by
Langmore, Susan E.
, Pisegna, Jessica M.
in
Adult
/ Barium Sulfate
/ Clinical Competence
/ Costs (Law)
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Deglutition - physiology
/ Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Endoscopy - methods
/ Female
/ Fluoroscopy - methods
/ Gastroenterology
/ Hepatology
/ Humans
/ Imaging
/ Larynx - diagnostic imaging
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Middle Aged
/ Mortgage-backed securities
/ Original Article
/ Otorhinolaryngology
/ Pharynx - diagnostic imaging
/ Radiology
/ Random Allocation
/ Severity of Illness Index
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ Symptom Assessment - methods
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Parameters of Instrumental Swallowing Evaluations: Describing a Diagnostic Dilemma
by
Langmore, Susan E.
, Pisegna, Jessica M.
in
Adult
/ Barium Sulfate
/ Clinical Competence
/ Costs (Law)
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Deglutition - physiology
/ Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Endoscopy - methods
/ Female
/ Fluoroscopy - methods
/ Gastroenterology
/ Hepatology
/ Humans
/ Imaging
/ Larynx - diagnostic imaging
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Middle Aged
/ Mortgage-backed securities
/ Original Article
/ Otorhinolaryngology
/ Pharynx - diagnostic imaging
/ Radiology
/ Random Allocation
/ Severity of Illness Index
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ Symptom Assessment - methods
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Parameters of Instrumental Swallowing Evaluations: Describing a Diagnostic Dilemma
Journal Article
Parameters of Instrumental Swallowing Evaluations: Describing a Diagnostic Dilemma
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The aim of this study was to compare selected parameters of two swallow evaluations: fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and the modified barium swallow (MBS) study. This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Fifty-five clinicians were asked to watch video recordings of swallow evaluations of 2 patients that were done using fluoroscopy and endoscopy simultaneously. In a randomized order, clinicians viewed 4 edited videos from simultaneous evaluations: the FEES and MBS videos of patient 1 and 2 each taking one swallow of 5 mL applesauce. Clinicians filled out a questionnaire that asked (1) which anatomical sites they could visualize on each video, (2) where they saw pharyngeal residue after a swallow, (3) their overall clinical impression of the pharyngeal residue, and (4) their opinions of the evaluation styles. Clinicians reported a significant difference in the visualization of anatomical sites, 11 of the 15 sites were reported as better-visualized on the FEES than on the MBS video (
p
< 0.05). Clinicians also rated residue to be present in more locations on the FEES than on the MBS. Clinicians’ overall impressions of the severity of residue on the same exact swallow were significantly different depending on the evaluation type (FEES vs. MBS for patient 1 χ
2
= 20.05,
p
< 0.0001; patient 2 χ
2
= 7.52,
p
= 0.006), with FEES videos rated more severely. FEES advantages were: more visualization of pharyngeal and laryngeal swallowing anatomy and residue. However, as a result, clinicians provided more severe impressions of residue amount on FEES. On one hand, this suggests that FEES is a more sensitive tool than MBS studies, but on the other hand, clinicians might provide more severe interpretations on FEES.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.