Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Body mass and sex, but not breeding condition and season, influence open‐field exploration in the yellow‐necked mouse
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Body mass and sex, but not breeding condition and season, influence open‐field exploration in the yellow‐necked mouse
Do you wish to request the book?
Body mass and sex, but not breeding condition and season, influence open‐field exploration in the yellow‐necked mouse
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Body mass and sex, but not breeding condition and season, influence open‐field exploration in the yellow‐necked mouse
2022
Overview
Theory predicts that risk taking should be influenced by external (e.g., season) and internal (e.g., breeding condition, sex, and body mass) conditions. We investigated whether these factors are associated with a potentially risky behavior: exploration of a novel environment. We conducted repeated open‐field tests of exploration in a common forest rodent, the yellow‐necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis. Contrary to expectations, the exploration did not vary with the season (spring vs. fall) or the reproductive status of the tested animals. Also unexpectedly, there was an inverted U‐shaped relationship between body mass and exploration: animals with intermediate body mass tended to have the highest exploration tendencies. Males were more exploratory than females. Finally, even after adjusting for the effects of body mass and sex, individuals exhibited consistent, repeatable differences in exploration tendencies (“behavioral types” or “personalities”). The discrepancies between certain broad generalizations and our results suggest that risk taking depends on details of species‐specific biology. We placed wild rodents (yellow‐necked mice, Apodemus flavicollis) in a novel environment (an open arena) and evaluated how body mass, sex, reproductive status, and season affect their exploration. We found (1) an inverted U‐shaped relationship between body mass and exploration, (2) higher exploration in males than in females, and (3) no influence of season or reproductive status on exploration.
