Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The contemporary use of emergency pericardiocentesis in trauma: A nationwide trend analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The contemporary use of emergency pericardiocentesis in trauma: A nationwide trend analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
The contemporary use of emergency pericardiocentesis in trauma: A nationwide trend analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The contemporary use of emergency pericardiocentesis in trauma: A nationwide trend analysis
2025
Overview
Pericardiocentesis is a critical skill taught by the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) course, yet substantial knowledge gaps exist regarding recent practice changes and indications for pericardiocentesis. This study aims to characterize contemporary practice patterns and nationwide trends in the use of emergency pericardiocentesis in trauma.
A retrospective study of the National Trauma Data Bank (2011−2022) identified patients undergoing pericardiocentesis within 48 h of arrival prior to any cardiac repair surgery. The primary outcomes were pericardiocentesis timing and the proportion of patients with significant cardiac injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale 3, 5, or 6). Patient characteristics and clinical course were analyzed. Trend analysis was conducted using the Cochran–Armitage test.
A total of 1036 patients were included; 59 % sustained blunt trauma, and 25 % were hypotensive on arrival. Median time to pericardiocentesis was 38 min [IQR: 19–74] for penetrating trauma and 78 min [IQR: 24–314] for blunt trauma. Following pericardiocentesis, 79 % of penetrating and 34 % of blunt trauma patients were taken to the operating room. From 2011 to 2022, there was a significant downward linear trend in the proportion of patients diagnosed with cardiac injuries in penetrating trauma (range: 55 % to 27 %; P for trend < 0.001), while blunt trauma cases showed no significant change (range: 15 % to 9 %; P for trend = 0.623).
Emergent pericardiocentesis is used differently in penetrating and blunt trauma. The likelihood of identifying cardiac injuries has declined over time in penetrating trauma. In contrast, blunt trauma patients were more likely to undergo delayed pericardiocentesis, with fewer proceeding to surgery. These observed differences in timing and surgical progression may reflect evolving clinical practices and decision-making patterns in trauma care. This changing trend provides insight into evolving trauma care and highlights the contemporary role of pericardiocentesis in trauma.
•Significant downward trend in cardiac injury diagnoses after pericardiocentesis in penetrating trauma.•Persistent diagnostic challenges in identifying blunt cardiac injury.•Distinct clinical decision thresholds between blunt and penetrating trauma cases.•Opportunities to refine trauma protocols and ATLS® training in accordance with contemporary clinical practice.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
Subject
