Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Comparison of In-Person and Telehealth Personalized Exercise Programs for Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Comparison of In-Person and Telehealth Personalized Exercise Programs for Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
A Comparison of In-Person and Telehealth Personalized Exercise Programs for Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Comparison of In-Person and Telehealth Personalized Exercise Programs for Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis
2025
Overview
Background/Objectives: This study evaluates the effects of a personalized exercise program on symptoms (pain, fatigue, sleep, cognitive function, physical function), resilience, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and compares the effectiveness of in-person versus telehealth delivery. Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted on two 12-week randomized control pilot studies for solid tumor cancer survivors. One study involved in-person home visits with telephone follow-ups. The second utilized weekly exercise recommendations via a smartphone app. Both studies had control participants who received the standard care. Symptoms, resilience, and HRQOL were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Paired t-tests were conducted for intervention effects and ANCOVA for group differences, adjusting for age and education. Results: The analysis included 75 program completers: 15 in-person (iHBE), 38 telehealth (TEHE), and 22 who received standard care. Those receiving exercise interventions reported improvements in physical (t = 3.0, p < 0.01) and mental fatigability (t = 3.1, p < 0.01) at program completion compared to baseline. Comparing the mean changes between participants receiving exercise interventions in-person and via telehealth, there were no significant differences between the two delivery methods except perceived visuo-perceptual cognitive difficulty (F = 3.55, p = 0.027), where telehealth showed a slight advantage. Conclusions: The study provides initial evidence of the effectiveness of a telehealth personalized exercise on fatigability and cognitive difficulty, suggesting it is a potential viable alternative to in-person intervention. Further research with a larger cohort is essential to ascertain the effects of these interventional modalities on cancer-related health outcomes.
