MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study
Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study
Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study
Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study
Journal Article

Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are traditionally managed with standard‐of‐care dressings, compression and appropriate adjunctive venous interventions for pathologic venous reflux. Due to pathophysiological complexity and underlying patient comorbidities, conducting randomised controlled trials to evaluate the comparative efficacy of advanced treatment modalities is difficult, as many patients would likely be excluded. This retrospective, pragmatic, real‐world evidence (RWE) study compared the healing outcomes of VLUs treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 312) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 239) in outpatient wound care centres. Unlike restrictive randomised controlled trials, minimal inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create two treatment cohorts that reflected the general VLU population. The incidence (%) of closure was greater in OFM‐treated VLUs at 12, 24 and 36 weeks, and this difference was significant at 24 and 36 weeks compared to collagen/ORC. Median time to wound closure was significantly faster (p = 0.045) in the OFM cohort (11.1 ± 0.6 weeks) compared to the collagen/ORC group (12.3 ± 1.0 weeks). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that OFM‐treated VLUs had a significantly greater probability of healing (up to ~40%). This RWE comparative efficacy study further substantiates the clinical benefit of OFM in the treatment of chronic wounds, such as VLU, in a real‐world patient cohort.