Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Accuracy of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Estimation of Extracellular Space in Healthy Subjects and in Fluid Retention States
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Accuracy of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Estimation of Extracellular Space in Healthy Subjects and in Fluid Retention States
Do you wish to request the book?
Accuracy of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Estimation of Extracellular Space in Healthy Subjects and in Fluid Retention States
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Accuracy of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Estimation of Extracellular Space in Healthy Subjects and in Fluid Retention States
1994
Overview
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a noninvasive method recently introduced for body fluid evaluation in healthy subjects. The purpose of this paper is to verify the reliability of bioelectrical measurements in extracellular water (ECW) prediction in healthy subjects and in fluid retention states. We studied 40 subjects (19 males and 21 females) aged 21-81 years; 22 were healthy subjects, 12 were affected by chronic heart failure, and 6 by chronic renal failure. In all subjects resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) at 1 and 50 kHz corrected for height were compared with ECW measured by the bromide dilution method. Our results suggested a different behavior of the current in fluid-retention states with respect to healthy subjects. ECW was best predicted by resistance at 1 kHz corrected for height, group (considered as dummy variable), weight and gender (R² = 0.89, p < 0.001, SEE = 1.7 liters). The bioelectrical impedance analysis at 50 kHz explained the 89% of ECW variability when resistance and reactance corrected for height are considered with gender group and weight (R² = 0.89, p < 0.001, SEE = 1.7 liters). In conclusion, the bioelectrical method at 1 kHz can be considered sufficiently accurate in ECW prediction in healthy subjects and in fluid retention states. Also, the bioelectrical impedance analysis at 50 kHz is useful for predicting ECW, but his role must be further investigated.
Publisher
S. Karger,Karger
Subject
