Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system
Do you wish to request the book?
NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system
2025
Overview
The National Comprehensive Cancer Care Network (NCCN) provides recommendations for patients with colorectal cancer. Concordance with evidence-based guidelines improves outcomes. Our objectives were to 1) examine rates of guideline non-concordance in a large vertically integrated health system; 2) examine factors associated with non-concordant care, and 3) identify geographical patterns of non-concordant care.
Colorectal cancer patients were identified from a single-state 16 hospital health-system cancer registry diagnosed between 2011 and 2021. We defined major (MAJ) and minor (MIN) quality indicators of guideline-concordance based on NCCN guidelines. Regression methods were used to identify predictors of major quality criteria non-concordance. County-level mapping was used to identify geographical locations of the highest rates of non-concordance.
Overall, 2324 patients with colon and rectal cancer were analyzed. There was a complete guideline concordance (an absence of guideline non-concordance) rate of 24.7% (n = 573), MIN only guideline non-concordance rate of 63.3% (n = 1471), and MAJ non-concordance rate of 12.4% (n = 280). Predictors of MAJ non-concordance for colon cancer were stage, >1 Charleson-Deyo Score, >60 days from diagnosis to treatment, and >1 hospital network used for care. Predictors of MAJ non-concordance for rectal cancer were >60 days from diagnosis to treatment, and >1 facility used for care. Marion county had the highest rates of non-concordance for colon and rectal cancer.
The majority of colon and rectal cancer patients in a large health system received guideline concordant major quality indicators, however 12% of patients do not. An identifiable geographical location with the highest rates of non-concordance and its associated factors serves as a target for future quality improvement.
•Concordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines improves outcomes.•Major (MAJ) and minor (MIN) quality indicators of guideline-concordance were defined.•Among patients with colorectal cancers there was a MAJ non-concordance rate of 12.4 %.•Patients with >60 days from diagnosis to treatment had increased MAJ non-concordance.•The largest county in the state had the highest rates of MAJ non-concordance.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
Subject
