MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers
Journal Article

Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Adolescents with blunt solid organ injuries (BSOI) are cared for at both pediatric trauma centers (PTC) and adult trauma centers (ATC). Over the past decade, treatment strategies have shifted towards non-operative management with reported favorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare management strategies and outcomes between PTC and ATC. We queried the 2016–2018 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) datasets to identify adolescents between the ages of 16 and 19 with BSOI. Characteristics were stratified by center type (pediatric or adult) for comparative analyses. Separate logistic regressions were used to assess the association of hospital type, location of injury, age, gender, weight, Glascow Coma Score (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for outcomes of interest. Among the 3,011,310 patients enrolled in the 2016–2018 TQIP datasets, 106,892 (3.5%) had a BSOI ICD9/10 code. Of those, 9,193 (8.6%) were between 16 and 19 years of age and included in this analysis. Within this cohort, 6,073 (66.1%) were managed at an ATC and 3,120 (33.9%) were managed at a PTC. While statistically different, there were no clinically relevant differences for age, weight, and sex between groups. A significantly higher ISS and lower GCS score were observed among those admitted to ATC compared to PTC. ICU admissions were more frequent at ATC. Number of blood transfusions by 4 h after presentation were also higher among those admitted to an ATC. Despite a lower ISS and higher GCS at presentation, mortality was higher among those treated at a PTC with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.42 (1.31–4.53). After excluding adolescents with a traumatic brain injury, a common cause of mortality among adolescent trauma patients, these differences in outcomes persisted. Our data suggest that adolescents with BSOI managed at a PTC are less likely to receive blood transfusions by 4 h of admission or be admitted to the ICU than those managed at an ATC. However, this more conservative approach may come at the expense of higher overall mortality. Further work is needed to understand these differences and determine if PTC need to be more aggressive in managing BSOI. •Adolescents suffering a BSOI admitted to an ATC are more likely to be admitted to the ICU and receive blood than those admitted to a PTC.•Mortality associated with adolescent BSOI appears to be higher among those treated at a PTC compared to those treated at an ATC.•Further studies are needed to determine if a more conservative approach to the management of BSOI in adolescents affects survival.