Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Deciding under Doubt: A Theory of Risk Aversion, Time Discounting Preferences, and Educational Decision-making
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Deciding under Doubt: A Theory of Risk Aversion, Time Discounting Preferences, and Educational Decision-making
Do you wish to request the book?
Deciding under Doubt: A Theory of Risk Aversion, Time Discounting Preferences, and Educational Decision-making
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Deciding under Doubt: A Theory of Risk Aversion, Time Discounting Preferences, and Educational Decision-making
2014
Overview
We develop a rational choice model of educational decision-making in which the utility of educational choices depends on students' risk aversion and their time discounting preferences. We argue for the role of risk aversion and time discounting preferences in the choice of different tracks in secondary education and in mediating the impact of socioeconomic background on such choices. Enrolment decisions in Danish secondary education provide our empirical example, and the results are generally in line with the proposed theory in that (i) risk aversion deters students from choosing the academically challenging but economically rewarding academic track in secondary education, (ii) students with a low time discount rate are particularly likely to enter the academic track, and (iii) students from advantaged socioeconomic backgrounds are not affected by risk aversion when making educational decisions.
