Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Participant Use of Artificial Intelligence in Online Focus Groups: An Experiential Account
by
Pike, Alexandra C.
, Preston, Catherine
, Stafford, Lucy
in
Artificial intelligence
/ Chat
/ Fallibility
/ Focus groups
/ Language modeling
/ Large language models
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Participant Use of Artificial Intelligence in Online Focus Groups: An Experiential Account
by
Pike, Alexandra C.
, Preston, Catherine
, Stafford, Lucy
in
Artificial intelligence
/ Chat
/ Fallibility
/ Focus groups
/ Language modeling
/ Large language models
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Participant Use of Artificial Intelligence in Online Focus Groups: An Experiential Account
Journal Article
Participant Use of Artificial Intelligence in Online Focus Groups: An Experiential Account
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Large language models (LLMs), one application of artificial intelligence, experienced a surge in users between 2022–2023. During this time, we were conducting online focus groups in which participants insisted on responding using the chat box feature. Based on several chat box responses, we became concerned they were LLM generated. Out of the 42 participants who typed a chat box response during a focus group, we identify 9 as potentially providing LLM generated answers and present their responses with the highest similarity score to an LLM answer. Given the growth and improvement in LLMs, we believe that this issue is likely to increase in frequency. In response to this, in this article we reflect on (1) strategies to prevent participants from using LLMs, (2) indicators LLMs may be being used, (3) the fallibility of identifying LLM generated responses, (4) philosophical frameworks that may permit LLM responses to be incorporated into analyses, and (5) procedures researchers may follow to evaluate the influence of LLM responses on their results.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.