Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Whistleblowing Paradigms
by
Gollwitzer, Mario
, Fischer, Moritz
in
Disclosure
/ Game theory
/ Meta-analysis
/ Paradigms
/ Whistle blowing
/ Whistleblowing
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Whistleblowing Paradigms
by
Gollwitzer, Mario
, Fischer, Moritz
in
Disclosure
/ Game theory
/ Meta-analysis
/ Paradigms
/ Whistle blowing
/ Whistleblowing
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Whistleblowing Paradigms
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Operationalizing whistleblowing in a valid paradigm is an important yet challenging endeavor. In the present article, we review four categories of whistleblowing paradigms—scenario studies, autobiographical recalls, immersive behavioral paradigms, and economic games—and discuss how they capture the definitory features of whistleblowing. Moreover, we evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each paradigm along selected psychometric criteria. Our review suggests that each of these paradigms comes with individual strength and weaknesses regarding the robustness against socially desirable responding, their efficiency, and whether or not they avoid using deception. We call for future research to conduct multi-method studies combining the four categories of whistleblowing paradigms within the same sample in order to test their convergence empirically.
Publisher
University of California Press,University of California Press, Journals & Digital Publishing Division
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.