Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A systematic review on voiceless patients’ willingness to adopt high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in intensive care units
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A systematic review on voiceless patients’ willingness to adopt high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in intensive care units
Do you wish to request the book?
A systematic review on voiceless patients’ willingness to adopt high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in intensive care units
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A systematic review on voiceless patients’ willingness to adopt high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in intensive care units
2021
Overview
To systematically evaluate the acceptability of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication (high-tech AAC) among ICU patients who are voiceless guided by the technology acceptance model (TAM).
We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database and Wanfang Database from database inception to September 2019. Studies that examined conscious nonverbal ICU patients with high-tech AAC intervention were included. Two reviewers independently collected and evaluated all the studies. The methodological quality was assessed by using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.
Eighteen studies with a total of 914 patients met the inclusion criteria, and the quality of the studies varied from low to moderate. Based on the TAM, ICU voiceless patients perceived that high-tech AAC was useful, was easy to use, decreased communication difficulties, reduced negative emotions, and improved symptom identification and management. Patients maintained a positive attitude and were willing to continue to use high-tech AAC.
Although the existing evidence is limited, voiceless patients regard high-tech AAC devices as a useful, reliable, and acceptable alternative communication choice in the ICU. Multicenter, large-sample, and high-quality studies are highly recommended in the future.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Elsevier Limited
