Journal Article

Combination of two desensitizing protocols to control dentin hypersensitivity in non-carious lesions: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Silva Cecy Martins, de Melo Pingarilho Carneiro Alexandra, Araújo Jesuína Lamartine Nogueira, da Silva Pompeu Danielle, Barbosa, Gabriela Monteiro, Barros Antonia Patricia Oliveira, de Melo Alencar Cristiane

2022

Overview

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) combined with 8% strontium acetate (SA8%) in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in non-carious lesions and analyzed the risk factors with the patient’s quality of life.MethodsEighty teeth with DH were randomly allocated into four treatment groups (n = 20): G1, PBM imitation + toothpaste with no active ingredient; G2, PBM imitation + toothpaste with SA8%; G3, PBM + toothpaste without the active ingredient; and G4, PBM + toothpaste with SA8%. Participants were provided with a questionnaire on the experience of dentin hypersensitivity (QEDH) to assess the impact of desensitizing treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Friedman and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for intra- and intergroup comparisons, and Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests were used to analyze HRQL. All analyses used significance levels of 5%.ResultsIntergroup comparisons revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05); G4 had the best response in terms of HD reduction in G4 compared to the other groups on the 7th day of assessment (T3). Only G4 showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the reduction of EDH for intragroup analysis.ConclusionThe combination of therapies was more effective in reducing DH than the isolated use of these strategies.Clinical relevanceThe combination of therapies is effective in the treatment of DH.

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Acetic acid / Clinical trials / Dentifrices / Dentin / Double-blind studies / Hypersensitivity / Lesions / Quality of life / Risk factors / Statistical analysis / Strontium / Toothpaste