Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Efficacy of Topical Cosmetic Containing Alpha‐Arbutin 5% and Kojic Acid 2% Compared With Triple Combination Cream for the Treatment of Melasma: A Split‐Face, Evaluator‐Blinded Randomized Pilot Study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Efficacy of Topical Cosmetic Containing Alpha‐Arbutin 5% and Kojic Acid 2% Compared With Triple Combination Cream for the Treatment of Melasma: A Split‐Face, Evaluator‐Blinded Randomized Pilot Study
Do you wish to request the book?
The Efficacy of Topical Cosmetic Containing Alpha‐Arbutin 5% and Kojic Acid 2% Compared With Triple Combination Cream for the Treatment of Melasma: A Split‐Face, Evaluator‐Blinded Randomized Pilot Study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Efficacy of Topical Cosmetic Containing Alpha‐Arbutin 5% and Kojic Acid 2% Compared With Triple Combination Cream for the Treatment of Melasma: A Split‐Face, Evaluator‐Blinded Randomized Pilot Study
2025
Overview
Background While the gold standard treatment for melasma is triple combination cream (TCC), arbutin and kojic acid demonstrate their benefits and may be used as an alternative. Aims To investigate the efficacy of cream containing alpha‐arbutin 5% and kojic acid 2% (AAK) compared with TCC for melasma treatment. Patients/Methods A split‐faced, randomized study was conducted among 30 participants with melasma, and all were randomized to receive AAK or TCC on each side of their face for 12‐week along with 4‐week follow‐up period. The melanin index (MI), modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI), and physician global assessment (PGA) scores were used to measure the effectiveness of interventions. Recurrence of melasma after treatment discontinuation was evaluated by MI and mMASI. Patient satisfactions and adverse effects were also evaluated. In the analysis, the mean difference (MD) was used for MI and mMASI, while Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was for the PGA scores, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction. Results The MD of MI and mMASI scores were not different between groups (mMASI [p = 0.344] and MI [p = 0.268]). The PGA scores only showed improvement on the TCC‐treated side (p = 0.032). Compared to the AKK group, the subjects with TCC showed higher severity of recurrence (MI [p = 0.004] and mMASI [p = 0.045]). No difference in patient satisfaction score between the groups, but erythema and stinging were higher in the TCC group. Conclusions The AAK cream appeared to be effective for melasma treatment, highlighting a lower recurrent rate and fewer adverse events than standard therapy. Trial Registration: thaiclinicaltrials.org: TCTR20230124004
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc
