Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Impact of Informative Context’s Meaning Consistency During Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
by
Binder, Katherine S.
, Pender, Kaitlyn Wade
, Lowell, Randy
in
5‐College / university
/ 6‐Adult
/ Acquisition
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Cognitive
/ Cognitive Processes
/ Comprehension
/ Context
/ Cues
/ Delayed
/ Experimental/Quasi‐experimental
/ Incidental Learning
/ Language learners
/ Meaning
/ Memory
/ Memory tests
/ Quasi-experimental methods
/ Reading Comprehension
/ Reading Rate
/ Recall
/ Recall (Psychology)
/ Retention (Psychology)
/ Same day
/ Second language learning
/ Sentences
/ Silent Reading
/ Vocabulary
/ Vocabulary Development
/ Vocabulary learning
/ Vocabulary ‐ Context clues
/ Word Recognition
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Impact of Informative Context’s Meaning Consistency During Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
by
Binder, Katherine S.
, Pender, Kaitlyn Wade
, Lowell, Randy
in
5‐College / university
/ 6‐Adult
/ Acquisition
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Cognitive
/ Cognitive Processes
/ Comprehension
/ Context
/ Cues
/ Delayed
/ Experimental/Quasi‐experimental
/ Incidental Learning
/ Language learners
/ Meaning
/ Memory
/ Memory tests
/ Quasi-experimental methods
/ Reading Comprehension
/ Reading Rate
/ Recall
/ Recall (Psychology)
/ Retention (Psychology)
/ Same day
/ Second language learning
/ Sentences
/ Silent Reading
/ Vocabulary
/ Vocabulary Development
/ Vocabulary learning
/ Vocabulary ‐ Context clues
/ Word Recognition
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Impact of Informative Context’s Meaning Consistency During Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
by
Binder, Katherine S.
, Pender, Kaitlyn Wade
, Lowell, Randy
in
5‐College / university
/ 6‐Adult
/ Acquisition
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Cognitive
/ Cognitive Processes
/ Comprehension
/ Context
/ Cues
/ Delayed
/ Experimental/Quasi‐experimental
/ Incidental Learning
/ Language learners
/ Meaning
/ Memory
/ Memory tests
/ Quasi-experimental methods
/ Reading Comprehension
/ Reading Rate
/ Recall
/ Recall (Psychology)
/ Retention (Psychology)
/ Same day
/ Second language learning
/ Sentences
/ Silent Reading
/ Vocabulary
/ Vocabulary Development
/ Vocabulary learning
/ Vocabulary ‐ Context clues
/ Word Recognition
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Impact of Informative Context’s Meaning Consistency During Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
Journal Article
Impact of Informative Context’s Meaning Consistency During Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The authors examined the influence of context meaning consistency on incidental vocabulary acquisition during reading. Context meaning consistency refers to informational context that reflected the same meaning (i.e., consistent) or different meanings (i.e., inconsistent) across two self-paced reading sessions for a given item (both sessions on the same day). The first sentence of each sentence-pair item contained informational context, and the second sentence contained a target word (novel target or known control). Acquisition was assessed via surprise memory tests given right after the reading sessions (immediate) and again approximately a week later (delayed). Inconsistent context was generally associated with inflated reading times and less recall than consistent context, and retention was particularly low when the first encounter with the novel target was during the second reading session. Self-paced reading times were also particularly inflated in the second reading session for items in which readers encountered the novel word version of the target for the first time (i.e., known control encountered during the first reading session instead). Acquisition was facilitated most for novel targets that were presented during both reading sessions in consistent meaning context, but suffered the most in the case of consistent context and the novel target initially encountered in the second session. When presented with different meanings for the same novel target across self-paced reading sessions (inconsistent context condition), the intended meaning for the initial presentation was more likely to remain in memory.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.