Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The number needed to treat: it is time to bow out gracefully
by
Morgan, Rebecca L.
, Murad, M. Hassan
, Davitkov, Perica
, Ramachandran, Neha
, Falck-Ytter, Yngve
in
Absoulte risk reduction
/ Cardiovascular disease
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical practice guidelines
/ Decision Making
/ Editing
/ Evidence-based Medicine
/ Guidelines
/ Health technology assessment
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Intervention
/ Number needed to harm
/ Number needed to treat
/ Numbers Needed To Treat
/ Practice Guidelines as Topic
/ Prevention
/ Risk difference
/ Statistical analysis
/ Technology assessment
/ Technology Assessment, Biomedical
/ Treatment effect
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The number needed to treat: it is time to bow out gracefully
by
Morgan, Rebecca L.
, Murad, M. Hassan
, Davitkov, Perica
, Ramachandran, Neha
, Falck-Ytter, Yngve
in
Absoulte risk reduction
/ Cardiovascular disease
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical practice guidelines
/ Decision Making
/ Editing
/ Evidence-based Medicine
/ Guidelines
/ Health technology assessment
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Intervention
/ Number needed to harm
/ Number needed to treat
/ Numbers Needed To Treat
/ Practice Guidelines as Topic
/ Prevention
/ Risk difference
/ Statistical analysis
/ Technology assessment
/ Technology Assessment, Biomedical
/ Treatment effect
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The number needed to treat: it is time to bow out gracefully
by
Morgan, Rebecca L.
, Murad, M. Hassan
, Davitkov, Perica
, Ramachandran, Neha
, Falck-Ytter, Yngve
in
Absoulte risk reduction
/ Cardiovascular disease
/ Clinical medicine
/ Clinical practice guidelines
/ Decision Making
/ Editing
/ Evidence-based Medicine
/ Guidelines
/ Health technology assessment
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Intervention
/ Number needed to harm
/ Number needed to treat
/ Numbers Needed To Treat
/ Practice Guidelines as Topic
/ Prevention
/ Risk difference
/ Statistical analysis
/ Technology assessment
/ Technology Assessment, Biomedical
/ Treatment effect
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The number needed to treat: it is time to bow out gracefully
Journal Article
The number needed to treat: it is time to bow out gracefully
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The number needed to treat (NNT) is a simple-to-understand absolute effect measure. However, it is only sensible when the risk difference is statistically significant. We highlight two important limitations of using NNT in the context of decision-making (developing a guideline, a policy decision, or a health technology assessment). The first limitation of NNT relates to difficulties in expressing and interpreting the confidence interval (CI) for the NNT when the CI of the risk difference includes the null (ie, the results are not statistically significant). This CI of NNT will be disjointed and will include implausible values. The second limitation of NNT relates to the increased complexity of trading off benefits and harms on the NNT scale. This proposal calls for abandoning the use of NNT from decision-making contexts.
The number needed to treat (NNT) has statistical and methodological limitations that make it unhelpful in the context of developing clinical practice guidelines and policy decisions.
•The number needed to treat (NNT) is a simple-to-understand absolute effect measure.•When results are nonsignificant, the confidence interval of NNT includes infinity.•Making decisions based on multiple outcomes is complicated with NNTs.•Due to several limitations, we propose abandoning NNT from decision-making contexts.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.