Journal Article

Mental Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Digital Remote Monitoring in Services for People with Psychosis

Wilson, Paul, Cella, Matteo, Lees, Jane, Beattie, Louise, Eisner, Emily, Richardson, Leonie, Drake, Richard J, Faulkner, Sophie, Kendall, Kimberley M, Bagg, Eloise, Warner, Alice, Oluwatayo, Anuoluwapo, Greenwood, Kathryn, Gumley, Andrew, Kenny, Alex, Nicholas, Jennifer, Ball, Hannah, Turner, Rebecca, Walters, James, Punchihewa, Sandapa, Richardson, Cara, Zhang, Xiaolong, Vogel, Evelin, Clifford, Sybil, Chalmers, Natalie, Sherborne, Joseph, O’Hare, Kathryn, Ainsworth, John, Schwannauer, Matthias, Bucci, Sandra, Wykes, Til, Maclean, Laura, Zahid, Uzma, Haddock, Gillian, Lewis, Shôn

2026

Overview

Abstract Background and Hypothesis Digital remote monitoring (DRM) captures service users’ health-related data remotely using devices such as smartphones and wearables. Data can be analyzed using advanced statistical methods (eg, machine learning) and shared with clinicians to aid assessment of people with psychosis’ mental health, enabling timely intervention. Such methods show promise in detecting early signs of psychosis relapse. However, little is known about clinicians’ views on the use of DRM for psychosis. This study explores multi-disciplinary staff perspectives on using DRM in practice. Study Design Fifty-nine mental health professionals were interviewed about their views on DRM in psychosis care. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Study Results: Five overarching themes were developed, each with subthemes: (1) the perceived value of digital remote monitoring; (2) clinicians’ trust in digital remote monitoring (3 subthemes); (3) service user factors (2 subthemes); (4) the technology-service user-clinician interface (2 subthemes); and (5) organizational context (2 subthemes). Conclusions Participants saw the value of using DRM to detect early signs of relapse and to encourage service user self-reflection on symptoms. However, the accuracy of data collected, the impact of remote monitoring on therapeutic relationships, data privacy, and workload, responsibility and resource implications were key concerns. Policies and guidelines outlining clinicians’ roles in relation to DRM and comprehensive training on its use are essential to support its implementation in practice. Further evaluation regarding the impact of digital remote monitoring on service user outcomes, therapeutic relationships, clinical workflows, and service costs is needed.

• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Subject: Adult / Attitude of Health Personnel / Female / Health Personnel / Humans / Male / Medical personnel / Mental health / Mental Health Services / Middle Aged / Psychosis / Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis / Psychotic Disorders - therapy / Qualitative Research / Regular / Telemedicine / Wearable Electronic Devices