Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Why Should Women Get Less?
by
Auspurg, Katrin
, Sauer, Carsten
, Hinz, Thomas
in
Earnings
/ Einkommensunterschied
/ Employees
/ Employment discrimination
/ Equity
/ Erwartung
/ Expectations
/ Experiment
/ Experiments
/ Factorials
/ Fairness
/ Females
/ Fictitious
/ Gender
/ Gender discrimination
/ Gender equity
/ Gender inequality
/ Gender pay gap
/ Gender studies
/ Gender wage gap
/ German language
/ Income
/ Income inequality
/ Labor market
/ Labor markets
/ Males
/ Men
/ Occupations
/ Polls & surveys
/ Reinforcement
/ Residents
/ Respondents
/ Sexes
/ Theorie
/ Wage differential
/ Wages & salaries
/ Women
/ Workers
/ Working women
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Why Should Women Get Less?
by
Auspurg, Katrin
, Sauer, Carsten
, Hinz, Thomas
in
Earnings
/ Einkommensunterschied
/ Employees
/ Employment discrimination
/ Equity
/ Erwartung
/ Expectations
/ Experiment
/ Experiments
/ Factorials
/ Fairness
/ Females
/ Fictitious
/ Gender
/ Gender discrimination
/ Gender equity
/ Gender inequality
/ Gender pay gap
/ Gender studies
/ Gender wage gap
/ German language
/ Income
/ Income inequality
/ Labor market
/ Labor markets
/ Males
/ Men
/ Occupations
/ Polls & surveys
/ Reinforcement
/ Residents
/ Respondents
/ Sexes
/ Theorie
/ Wage differential
/ Wages & salaries
/ Women
/ Workers
/ Working women
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Why Should Women Get Less?
by
Auspurg, Katrin
, Sauer, Carsten
, Hinz, Thomas
in
Earnings
/ Einkommensunterschied
/ Employees
/ Employment discrimination
/ Equity
/ Erwartung
/ Expectations
/ Experiment
/ Experiments
/ Factorials
/ Fairness
/ Females
/ Fictitious
/ Gender
/ Gender discrimination
/ Gender equity
/ Gender inequality
/ Gender pay gap
/ Gender studies
/ Gender wage gap
/ German language
/ Income
/ Income inequality
/ Labor market
/ Labor markets
/ Males
/ Men
/ Occupations
/ Polls & surveys
/ Reinforcement
/ Residents
/ Respondents
/ Sexes
/ Theorie
/ Wage differential
/ Wages & salaries
/ Women
/ Workers
/ Working women
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Why Should Women Get Less?
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Gender pay gaps likely persist in Western societies because both men and women consider somewhat lower earnings for female employees than for otherwise similar male employees to be fair. Two different theoretical approaches explain \"legitimate\" wage gaps: same-gender referent theory and reward expectations theory. The first approach states that women compare their lower earnings primarily with that of other underpaid women; the second approach argues that both men and women value gender as a status variable that yields lower expectations about how much each gender should be paid for otherwise equal work. This article is the first to analyze hypotheses contrasting the two theories using an experimental factorial survey design. In 2009, approximately 1,600 German residents rated more than 26,000 descriptions of fictitious employees. The labor market characteristics of each employee and the amount of information given about them were experimentally varied across all descriptions. The results primarily support reward expectations theory. Both men and women produced gender pay gaps in their fairness ratings (with the mean ratio of just female-to-male wages being.92). Respondents framed the just pay ratios by the gender inequalities they experienced in their own occupations, and some evidence of gender-specific evaluation standards emerged. (HoF/text adopted).
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.