Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Improving population size estimation at western capercaillie leks: lek counts versus genetic methods
by
Aleix‐Mata, Gaël
, Marty, Evelyn
, Mourierres, Pierre
, Sánchez, Antonio
, Lapébie, Pascal
, López‐Montoya, Antonio J.
, Pérez, Jesús M.
in
Birds
/ detection rate
/ feces
/ genetic mark-recapture model
/ Genotyping
/ Lek
/ lekking
/ males
/ mark-recapture studies
/ Mating
/ microsatellites
/ Montane environments
/ Mountain forests
/ non-invasive genetic sampling
/ Palearctic region
/ Population number
/ population size
/ Reproductive behaviour
/ species
/ Tetrao urogallus
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Improving population size estimation at western capercaillie leks: lek counts versus genetic methods
by
Aleix‐Mata, Gaël
, Marty, Evelyn
, Mourierres, Pierre
, Sánchez, Antonio
, Lapébie, Pascal
, López‐Montoya, Antonio J.
, Pérez, Jesús M.
in
Birds
/ detection rate
/ feces
/ genetic mark-recapture model
/ Genotyping
/ Lek
/ lekking
/ males
/ mark-recapture studies
/ Mating
/ microsatellites
/ Montane environments
/ Mountain forests
/ non-invasive genetic sampling
/ Palearctic region
/ Population number
/ population size
/ Reproductive behaviour
/ species
/ Tetrao urogallus
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Improving population size estimation at western capercaillie leks: lek counts versus genetic methods
by
Aleix‐Mata, Gaël
, Marty, Evelyn
, Mourierres, Pierre
, Sánchez, Antonio
, Lapébie, Pascal
, López‐Montoya, Antonio J.
, Pérez, Jesús M.
in
Birds
/ detection rate
/ feces
/ genetic mark-recapture model
/ Genotyping
/ Lek
/ lekking
/ males
/ mark-recapture studies
/ Mating
/ microsatellites
/ Montane environments
/ Mountain forests
/ non-invasive genetic sampling
/ Palearctic region
/ Population number
/ population size
/ Reproductive behaviour
/ species
/ Tetrao urogallus
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Improving population size estimation at western capercaillie leks: lek counts versus genetic methods
Journal Article
Improving population size estimation at western capercaillie leks: lek counts versus genetic methods
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The western capercaillie Tetrao urogallus, hereafter capercaillie, is the largest galliform bird present in the boreal and montane forests of the Western Palearctic. Precise and accurate methods for estimating the number of individuals and/or their densities are crucial for the proper management of its free‐ranging populations. However, obtaining reliable estimates of the abundance of populations of wild species and, particularly, of birds is not a simple task. In the case of lek‐mating birds such as capercaillie, surveys are traditionally based on lek counts, that is, counts of calling males present in their mating areas: the leks. This study was carried out on the Pyrenees at six capercaillie leks where two different lek counting approaches were performed: hide‐based and walk‐based. The results were compared with those obtained from an estimate of minimum population size (MPE) derived from genotyping all faeces samples found in the lek area, and with a population size estimate derived from a genetic mark‐recapture model (N^o) of each capercaillie lek. The results of N^o were used to estimate the detection rate (D) of both lek count approaches. Our results show that traditional lek counts do not detect all male capercaillies since the detection rate was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.26–0.43) for hide‐ and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.43–0.68) for walk‐based lek counts. Our results suggest that the walk‐based lek counts were more efficient than the hide‐based ones, providing more accurate results compared to the N^o estimate. The combination of non‐invasive sampling with genetic mark‐recapture model was found to be the most reliable method for obtaining the N^o of leks given that traditional lek counts underestimate the number of capercaillie and, furthermore, can cause disturbance to the species at these sites.
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd,John Wiley & Sons, Inc,Wiley
Subject
/ feces
/ genetic mark-recapture model
/ Lek
/ lekking
/ males
/ Mating
/ non-invasive genetic sampling
/ species
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.