Journal Article

THE PUBLIC FIGURE DOCTRINE AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY

Hughes, Kirsty

2019

Overview

This article argues that the public figure doctrine is doctrinally problematic and conceptually and normatively flawed. Doctrinal uncertainty surrounds who is affected and how rights are affected. Conceptually it raises challenges for universality, the non-hierarchical relationship between Articles 8 and 10 ECHR, the process of resolving rights conflicts, and the relationship between domestic law and the Convention. All of which necessitate a strong normative justification for the distinction. Yet there is no compelling rationale. The values underpinning the right to privacy of public figures are no different from those of other persons and there are other better mechanisms of accounting for freedom of expression. We should therefore reject the idea that public figures have fewer or weaker privacy rights or that the process of dealing with their rights is different and instead focus squarely upon the relative importance of the rights, and the degree of intrusion into those rights.

• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Subject: Celebrities / Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms / Freedom of expression / Freedom of speech / Freedom of the press / Human rights / Injunctions / Intrusion / Judges & magistrates / Jurisprudence / Justification / Law / Privacy / Privacy, Right of / Public figures / Public interest / Reputations / Right of privacy / Rights / Uncertainty