Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Comparison of Three Perfusion Algorithms in Patients at Risk of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Comparison of Three Perfusion Algorithms in Patients at Risk of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Do you wish to request the book?
A Comparison of Three Perfusion Algorithms in Patients at Risk of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Comparison of Three Perfusion Algorithms in Patients at Risk of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
2025
Overview
Background/Objectives: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) often presents with bilateral vasospasm and cortical spreading depolarizations. Computer tomography perfusion (CTP) is the prevailing screening method for detecting early changes in the cerebral blood flow. Commonly used CTP thresholds include an rCBF < 30% for the core volume and a Tmax > 6 s for hypoperfused tissue detection in acute ischemic stroke. These stroke algorithm computing thresholds compared to the contralateral hemisphere may or may not apply to detect tissue at risk of DCI. We aimed to quantify the volumetric agreement of three different stroke algorithms compared to the final infarct volumes as the standard. Methods: Furthermore, 123 CTP datasets of 75 patients with aSAH suspicious of DCI were processed using Intellispace Portal (ISP), Cercare Threshold, and Cercare Artificial Intelligence (AI) to calculate the tissue-at-risk (hypoperfused) and non-viable tissue (core) volumes. CT infarct volumes in plain CTs were segmented in the follow-up study by using a 3D slicer. Results: The calculated core volumes corresponded best to the final infarct volumes if DCI-related treatment was performed subsequently. Additional postprocessing improved the calculation of core volumes but overestimated the tissue at risk of hypoperfusion in DCI. Whereas the accuracy of tissue-at-risk prediction accelerated without treatment, underlining the importance of intra-arterial spasmolysis and induced hypertension in the prevention of DCI. Conclusions: Cercare AI and ISP revealed a sensitivity of 100% each, with a serious low specificity of <5% that was independent of treatment. Overall, the Cercare Threshold, applying the commonly used stroke thresholds, performed the best in predicting tissue at risk of hypoperfusion in DCI.
