Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Experiences of care for self-harm in the emergency department: comparison of the perspectives of patients, carers and practitioners
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Experiences of care for self-harm in the emergency department: comparison of the perspectives of patients, carers and practitioners
Do you wish to request the book?
Experiences of care for self-harm in the emergency department: comparison of the perspectives of patients, carers and practitioners
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Experiences of care for self-harm in the emergency department: comparison of the perspectives of patients, carers and practitioners
2021
Overview
BackgroundEach year, 220 000 episodes of self-harm are managed by emergency departments in England, providing support to people at risk of suicide.AimsTo explore treatment of self-harm in emergency departments, comparing perspectives of patients, carers and practitioners.MethodFocus groups and semi-structured interviews with 79 people explored experiences of receiving/delivering care. Participants were patients (7 young people, 12 adults), 8 carers, 15 generalist emergency department practitioners and 37 liaison psychiatry practitioners. Data were analysed using framework analysis.ResultsWe identified four themes. One was common across stakeholder groups: (a) the wider system is failing people who self-harm: they often only access crisis support as they are frequently excluded from services, leading to unhelpful cycles of attending the emergency department. Carers felt over-relied upon and ill-equipped to keep the person safe. Three themes reflected different perspectives across stakeholders: (b) practitioners feel powerless and become hardened towards patients, with patients feeling judged for seeking help which exacerbates their distress; (c) patients need a human connection to offer hope when life feels hopeless, yet practitioners underestimate the therapeutic potential of interactions; and (d) practitioners are fearful of blame if someone takes their life: formulaic question-and-answer risk assessments help make staff feel safer but patients feel this is not a valid way of assessing risk or addressing their needs.ConclusionsEmergency department practitioners should seek to build a human connection and validate patients’ distress, which offers hope when life feels hopeless. Patients consider this a therapeutic intervention in its own right. Investment in self-harm treatment is indicated.
