Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Implementation of a Family Planning Clinic–Based Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion Intervention
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Implementation of a Family Planning Clinic–Based Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion Intervention
Do you wish to request the book?
Implementation of a Family Planning Clinic–Based Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion Intervention
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Implementation of a Family Planning Clinic–Based Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion Intervention
2017
Overview
CONTEXT Despite multiple calls for clinic‐based services to identify and support women victimized by partner violence, screening remains uncommon in family planning clinics. Furthermore, traditional screening, based on disclosure of violence, may miss women who fear reporting their experiences. Strategies that are sensitive to the signs, symptoms and impact of trauma require exploration. METHODS In 2011, as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial, staff at 11 Pennsylvania family planning clinics were trained to offer a trauma‐informed intervention addressing intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion to all women seeking care, regardless of exposure to violence. The intervention sought to educate women about available resources and harm reduction strategies. In 2013, at the conclusion of the trial, 18 providers, five administrators and 49 patients completed semistructured interviews exploring acceptability of the intervention and barriers to implementation. Consensus and open coding strategies were used to analyze the data. RESULTS Providers reported that the intervention increased their confidence in discussing intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion. They noted that asking patients to share the educational information with other women facilitated the conversation. Barriers to implementation included lack of time and not having routine reminders to offer the intervention. Patients described how receiving the intervention gave them important information, made them feel supported and less isolated, and empowered them to help others. CONCLUSIONS A universal intervention may be acceptable to providers and patients. However, successful implementation in family planning settings may require attention to system‐level factors that providers view as barriers.
Publisher
Wiley,Wiley Subscription Services, Inc,Blackwell Publishers Inc
Subject
/ Adult
/ Attitude of Health Personnel
/ Barriers
/ Clinics
/ Coercion
/ Family Planning Services - education
/ Family Planning Services - methods
/ Fear
/ Female
/ Health Personnel - education
/ Health Personnel - psychology
/ Humans
/ Intimate Partner Violence - prevention & control
/ Intimate Partner Violence - psychology
/ Male
/ Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology
/ Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
/ Patients
/ Sex Offenses - prevention & control
/ Sexual Partners - psychology
/ Tests
/ Trauma
/ Women
