MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis
Journal Article

Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab — myocardial infarction versus other causes — differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Transvenous temporary cardiac pacing (TTCP) is a lifesaving procedure, but the incidence of complications and prognosis depends on the underlying cause. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics, complications, and prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) requiring TTCP vs. patients with TTCP due to other causes. The present analysis involved 244 cases in whom TTCP was performed between 2017 and 2021 in a high-volume cathlab. All the procedures were performed by an interventional cardiologist. MI constituted 46.3% of the patients (n = 113), including 63 ST-segment elevation MI patients (55.75%). Non-MI patients (control group) consisted of patients with any cause of bradycardia requiring TTCP. Myocardial infarction patients requiring TTCP are younger and have a higher prevalence of hypertension and heart failure. The pacing lead is more frequently inserted during asystole/resuscitation, and pacing was needed for a longer time. MI patients required cardiac implantable electronic device implantation less frequently than in other causes (22% vs. 82%, p < 0.01). The incidence of TTCP complications did not differ. The incidence of in-hospital death was 6.5-fold higher in TTCP patients with MI. Logistic regression showed MI to be a strong predictor of in-hospital death (odds ratio: 8.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-57.9). In-hospital mortality in MI patients requiring TTCP is 6.5-fold higher than in other patients with bradycardia. The complication rate of TTCP is similar in MI and non-MI patients. It is not TTCP but the severity of MI itself and the fact that a pacing lead is frequently implanted in asystole or during resuscitation that is responsible for the higher mortality rate.