Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy in Melasma Using Microinjections and Microneedling Techniques
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy in Melasma Using Microinjections and Microneedling Techniques
Do you wish to request the book?
Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy in Melasma Using Microinjections and Microneedling Techniques
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy in Melasma Using Microinjections and Microneedling Techniques
2025
Overview
Introduction Melasma is a long‐term acquired disorder characterized by symmetrical darkening in facial regions exposed to sunlight. Although some risk factors have been identified, the etiology remains unclear, and interventions frequently do not totally improve outcomes. Aim It compares the efficacy and side effects of platelet‐rich plasma therapy administered by microneedling versus microinjection to detect any difference in the delivery methods, treatment outcomes, and safety profiles. Methods In this prospective, single‐center, randomized split‐face research, 62 patients' melasma was treated with PRP therapy using microneedling versus microinjection. Microneedling and microinjection were used to apply PRP to the face's two sides. Photographs were obtained before therapy, and the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), Physician Global Assessment, and Patient Global Assessment were used for monthly follow‐up evaluation. In order to compare safety and efficacy, adverse events were recorded and statistical analysis was performed. Results A significantly significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed in the mean change in MASI score between microinjection and microneedling. The microneedling group showed a 73.33% improvement while the microinjection group had an 18.33% improvement, both of which were greater than 50%. The microneedling group showed a 46.67% improvement and the microinjection group had a 5% improvement of over 75%. There were no noteworthy negative effects observed. Conclusion PRP therapy with microneedling is superior to microinjection in treating melasma; patients who receive microneedling show noticeably better improvement.
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc
