Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Randomized Controlled Single-Center Trial Comparing Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy After Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Randomized Controlled Single-Center Trial Comparing Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy After Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy
Do you wish to request the book?
Randomized Controlled Single-Center Trial Comparing Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy After Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Single-Center Trial Comparing Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy After Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy
2012
Overview
Background
The aim of this single-center randomized trial was to compare the perioperative outcome of pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatogastrostomy (PG) vs pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ).
Methods
Randomization was done intraoperatively. PG was performed via anterior and posterior gastrotomy with pursestring and inverting seromuscular suture; control intervention was PJ with duct–mucosa anastomosis. The primary endpoint was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).
Results
From 2006 to 2011,
n
= 268 patients were screened and
n
= 116 were randomized to
n
= 59 PG and
n
= 57 PJ. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the primary endpoint (PG vs PJ, 10 % vs 12 %,
p
= 0.775). The subgroup of high-risk patients with a soft pancreas had a non-significantly lower pancreatic fistula rate with PG (PG vs PJ, 14 vs 24 %,
p
= 0.352). Analysis of secondary endpoints demonstrated a shorter operation time (404 vs 443 min,
p
= 0.005) and reduced hospital stay for PG (15 vs 17 days,
p
= 0.155). Delayed gastric emptying (DGE; PG vs PJ, 27 vs 17 %,
p
= 0.246) and intraluminal bleeding (PG vs PJ, 7 vs 2 %,
p
= 0.364) were more frequent with PG. Mortality was low in both groups (<2 %).
Conclusions
Our randomized controlled trial shows no difference between PG and PJ as reconstruction techniques after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. POPF rate, DGE, and bleeding were not statistically different. Operation time was significantly shorter in the PG group.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
