Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reflecting on Diagnostic Errors: Taking a Second Look is Not Enough
by
Norman, Geoffrey R.
, Monteiro, Sandra D.
, Patel, Ameen
, Sherbino, Jonathan
, Mazzetti, Ian
, Howey, Elizabeth
in
Adult
/ Clinical Competence
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Decision Making
/ Diagnostic Errors - psychology
/ Education, Medical, Graduate
/ Educational Measurement
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Information processing
/ Internal Medicine
/ Internal Medicine - education
/ Internship and Residency
/ Male
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical errors
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Thinking
2015
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reflecting on Diagnostic Errors: Taking a Second Look is Not Enough
by
Norman, Geoffrey R.
, Monteiro, Sandra D.
, Patel, Ameen
, Sherbino, Jonathan
, Mazzetti, Ian
, Howey, Elizabeth
in
Adult
/ Clinical Competence
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Decision Making
/ Diagnostic Errors - psychology
/ Education, Medical, Graduate
/ Educational Measurement
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Information processing
/ Internal Medicine
/ Internal Medicine - education
/ Internship and Residency
/ Male
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical errors
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Thinking
2015
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Reflecting on Diagnostic Errors: Taking a Second Look is Not Enough
by
Norman, Geoffrey R.
, Monteiro, Sandra D.
, Patel, Ameen
, Sherbino, Jonathan
, Mazzetti, Ian
, Howey, Elizabeth
in
Adult
/ Clinical Competence
/ Cognition & reasoning
/ Decision Making
/ Diagnostic Errors - psychology
/ Education, Medical, Graduate
/ Educational Measurement
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Information processing
/ Internal Medicine
/ Internal Medicine - education
/ Internship and Residency
/ Male
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical errors
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Thinking
2015
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Reflecting on Diagnostic Errors: Taking a Second Look is Not Enough
Journal Article
Reflecting on Diagnostic Errors: Taking a Second Look is Not Enough
2015
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
An experimenter controlled form of reflection has been shown to improve the detection and correction of diagnostic errors in some situations; however, the benefits of participant-controlled reflection have not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE
The goal of the current study is to examine how experience and a self-directed decision to reflect affect the accuracy of revised diagnoses.
DESIGN
Medical residents diagnosed 16 medical cases (pass 1). Participants were then given the opportunity to reflect on each case and revise their diagnoses (pass 2).
PARTICIPANTS
Forty-seven medical Residents in post-graduate year (PGY) 1, 2 and 3 were recruited from Hamilton Health Care Centres.
MAIN MEASURES
Diagnoses were scored as 0 (incorrect), 1 (partially correct) and 2 (correct). Accuracies and response times in pass 1 were analyzed using an ANOVA with three factors—PGY, Decision to revise yes/no, and Case 1–16, averaged across residents. The extent to which additional reflection affected accuracy was examined by analyzing only those cases that were revised, using a repeated measures ANOVA, with pass 1 or 2 as a within subject factor, and PGY and Case or Resident as a between-subject factor.
KEY RESULTS
The mean score at pass 1 for each level was PGY1, 1.17 (SE 0.50); PGY2, 1.35 (SE 0.67) and PGY3, 1.27 (SE 0.94). While there was a trend for increased accuracy with level, this did not achieve significance. The number of residents at each level who revised at least one diagnosis was 12/19 PGY1 (63 %), 9/11 PGY2 (82 %) and 8/17 PGY3 (47 %). Only 8 % of diagnoses were revised resulting in a small but significant increase in scores from Pass 1 to 2, from 1.20/2 to 1.22 /2 (
t
= 2.15,
p
= 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
Participants did engage in self-directed reflection for incorrect diagnoses; however, this strategy provided minimal benefits compared to knowing the correct answer. Education strategies should be directed at improving formal and experiential knowledge.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.