Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Nephrolithiasis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Nephrolithiasis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Nephrolithiasis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Nephrolithiasis, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis
2016
Overview
Summary
Our meta-analysis demonstrates that people with nephrolithiasis have decreased bone mineral density, an increased odds of osteoporosis, and potentially an elevated risk of fractures.
Introduction
People with nephrolithiasis might be at risk of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures, but the data is equivocal. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate if patients with nephrolithiasis have worse bone health outcomes (BMD), osteoporosis, and fractures versus healthy controls (HCs).
Methods
Two investigators searched major databases for articles reporting BMD (expressed as g/cm
2
or a T- or Z-score), osteoporosis or fractures in a sample of people with nephrolithiasis, and HCs. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for BMD parameters; in addition odds (ORs) for case-control and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) in longitudinal studies for categorical variables were calculated.
Results
From 1816 initial hits, 28 studies were included. A meta-analysis of case-control studies including 1595 patients with nephrolithiasis (mean age 41.1 years) versus 3402 HCs (mean age 40.2 years) was conducted. Patients with nephrolithiasis showed significant lower T-scores values for the spine (seven studies; SMD = −0.69; 95 % CI = −0.86 to −0.52;
I
2
= 0 %), total hip (seven studies; SMD = −0.82; 95 % CI = −1.11 to −0.52;
I
2
= 72 %), and femoral neck (six studies; SMD = −0.67; 95 % CI = −−1.00 to −0.34;
I
2
= 69 %). A meta-analysis of the case-controlled studies suggests that people with nephrolithiasis are at increased risk of fractures (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI = 1.12–1.17,
p
< 0.0001, studies = 4), while the risk of fractures in two longitudinal studies demonstrated trend level significance (HR = 1.31, 95 % CI = 0.95–1.62). People with nephrolithiasis were four times more likely to have osteoporosis than HCs (OR = 4.12,
p
< 0.0001).
Conclusions
Nephrolithiasis is associated with lower BMD, an increased risk of osteoporosis, and possibly, fractures. Future screening/preventative interventions targeting bone health might be indicated.
Publisher
Springer London,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
