Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Schizotypy, Psychosis Proneness, and the Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia and Resilience
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Schizotypy, Psychosis Proneness, and the Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia and Resilience
Do you wish to request the book?
Schizotypy, Psychosis Proneness, and the Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia and Resilience
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Schizotypy, Psychosis Proneness, and the Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia and Resilience
2025
Overview
Schizotypy is a well-established phenotype for psychosis proneness and risk. Yet, its genetic underpinnings and relations to genetic bases of the schizophrenia spectrum are not well understood owing to conflicting findings. In a deep phenotyping approach, we hypothesized that genetic markers of risk for and to schizophrenia are differentially associated with (trait-level) dimensions of schizotypy and (state-level) prodromal symptoms.
In 367 (130 male, 237 female) psychiatrically healthy young adults, we assessed multiple schizotypy instruments (OLIFE, SPQ-B, Multidimensional Schizotypy Scales), aggregated into composite scores, and a measure of prodromal symptoms (PQ-16). Those were tested for direct and interactive associations with the polygenic risk score (PRS) for schizophrenia and a novel PRS for resilience to schizophrenia.
Both prodromal symptom number (rho = 0.16, pcorr = .018) and distress (rho = 0.14, pcorr = .027) were positively related to the schizophrenia PRS. Positive schizotypy showed a similar association but did not remain significant after correction (rho = 0.11, pcorr = .082). Schizophrenia PRS and disorganized schizotypy had a negative interactive effect on prodromal symptom distress (b = -0.10, pcorr = .048). The resilience score did not show any significant associations with any of the measures.
These results further support the idea of a (partially) shared genetic basis of schizophrenia and nonclinical, predominantly positive expressions of the psychosis spectrum but also indicate relevant distinctions between the 2, possibly related to other modulating factors or general (transdiagnostic) psychopathological risk. In line with previous findings, effects seem to be more robust for state- than trait-level markers, but these may also be influencing each other.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Subject
/ Adult
/ Female
/ Genetic Predisposition to Disease
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Multifactorial Inheritance - genetics
/ Psychotic Disorders - genetics
/ Psychotic Disorders - physiopathology
/ Schizophrenia - physiopathology
/ Schizotypal Personality Disorder - genetics
