Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Artificial intelligence-derived left ventricular strain in echocardiography in patients treated with chemotherapy
by
Takagi, Ryu
, Yamada, Satoshi
, Iwasaki, Yoichi
, Kuwahara, Asuka
, Kubo, Takashi
, Satomi, Kazuhiro
, Kobayashi, Masatake
, Tanaka, Nobuhiro
in
Agreements
/ Artificial intelligence
/ Cardiovascular diseases
/ Chemotherapy
/ Coronary artery disease
/ Correlation
/ Echocardiography
/ Heart diseases
/ Hypertrophy
/ Medical imaging
/ Patients
/ Reproducibility
/ Structure-function relationships
/ Ventricle
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Artificial intelligence-derived left ventricular strain in echocardiography in patients treated with chemotherapy
by
Takagi, Ryu
, Yamada, Satoshi
, Iwasaki, Yoichi
, Kuwahara, Asuka
, Kubo, Takashi
, Satomi, Kazuhiro
, Kobayashi, Masatake
, Tanaka, Nobuhiro
in
Agreements
/ Artificial intelligence
/ Cardiovascular diseases
/ Chemotherapy
/ Coronary artery disease
/ Correlation
/ Echocardiography
/ Heart diseases
/ Hypertrophy
/ Medical imaging
/ Patients
/ Reproducibility
/ Structure-function relationships
/ Ventricle
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Artificial intelligence-derived left ventricular strain in echocardiography in patients treated with chemotherapy
by
Takagi, Ryu
, Yamada, Satoshi
, Iwasaki, Yoichi
, Kuwahara, Asuka
, Kubo, Takashi
, Satomi, Kazuhiro
, Kobayashi, Masatake
, Tanaka, Nobuhiro
in
Agreements
/ Artificial intelligence
/ Cardiovascular diseases
/ Chemotherapy
/ Coronary artery disease
/ Correlation
/ Echocardiography
/ Heart diseases
/ Hypertrophy
/ Medical imaging
/ Patients
/ Reproducibility
/ Structure-function relationships
/ Ventricle
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Artificial intelligence-derived left ventricular strain in echocardiography in patients treated with chemotherapy
Journal Article
Artificial intelligence-derived left ventricular strain in echocardiography in patients treated with chemotherapy
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an echocardiographic measure to detect chemotherapy-related cardiovascular dysfunction. However, its limited availability and the needed expertise may restrict its generalization. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based GLS might overcome these challenges. Our aims are to explore the agreements between AI-based GLS and conventional GLS, and to assess whether the agreements were influenced by expertise levels, cardiac remodeling and cardiovascular diseases/risks. Echocardiographic images in the apical four-chamber view of left ventricle were retrospectively analyzed based on AI-based GLS in patients treated with chemotherapy, and correlation between AI-based GLS (Caas Qardia, Pie Medical Imaging) and conventional GLS (Vivid E9/VividE95, GE Healthcare) were assessed. The agreement between unexperienced physicians (“GLS beginner”) and experienced echocardiographer were also assessed. Among 94 patients (mean age 69 ± 12 years, 73% female), mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 64 ± 6%, 14% of patients had left ventricular hypertrophy, and 21% had left atrial enlargement. Mean GLS was − 15.9 ± 3.4% and − 19.0 ± 3.7% for the AI and conventional method, respectively. There was a moderate correlation between these methods (rho = 0.74; p < 0.01), and bias was − 3.1% (95% limits of agreement: -8.1 to 2.0). The reproducibility between GLS beginner and an experienced echocardiographer was numerically better in the AI method than the conventional method (inter-observer agreement = 0.82 vs. 0.68). The agreements were consistent across abnormal cardiac structure and function categories (p-for-interaction > 0.10). In patients treated with chemotherapy. AI-based GLS was moderately correlated with conventional GLS and provided a numerically better reproducibility compared with conventional GLS, regardless of different levels of expertise.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.