Journal Article

How do AI markings on screening mammograms correspond to cancer location? An informed review of 270 breast cancer cases in BreastScreen Norway

Koch, Henrik Wethe, Styr, Bodil Margrethe, Haldorsen, Ingfrid Helene Salvesen, Larsen, Marthe, Martiniussen, Marit Almenning, Bartsch, Hauke, Fagerheim, Siri, Hofvind, Solveig

2024

Overview

Objectives To compare the location of AI markings on screening mammograms with cancer location on diagnostic mammograms, and to classify interval cancers with high AI score as false negative, minimal sign, or true negative. Methods In a retrospective study from 2022, we compared the performance of an AI system with independent double reading according to cancer detection. We found 93% (880/949) of the screen-detected cancers, and 40% (122/305) of the interval cancers to have the highest AI risk score (AI score of 10). In this study, four breast radiologists reviewed mammograms from 126 randomly selected screen-detected cancers and all 120 interval cancers with an AI score of 10. The location of the AI marking was stated as correct/not correct in craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique view. Interval cancers with an AI score of 10 were classified as false negative, minimal sign significant/non-specific, or true negative. Results All screen-detected cancers and 78% (93/120) of the interval cancers with an AI score of 10 were correctly located by the AI system. The AI markings matched in both views for 79% (100/126) of the screen-detected cancers and 22% (26/120) of the interval cancers. For interval cancers with an AI score of 10, 11% (13/120) were correctly located and classified as false negative, 10% (12/120) as minimal sign significant, 26% (31/120) as minimal sign non-specific, and 31% (37/120) as true negative. Conclusion AI markings corresponded to cancer location for all screen-detected cancers and 78% of the interval cancers with high AI score, indicating a potential for reducing the number of interval cancers. However, it is uncertain whether interval cancers with subtle findings in only one view are actionable for recall in a true screening setting. Clinical relevance statement In this study, AI markings corresponded to the location of the cancer in a high percentage of cases, indicating that the AI system accurately identifies the cancer location in mammograms with a high AI score. Key Points • All screen-detected and 78% of the interval cancers with high AI risk score (AI score of 10) had AI markings in one or two views corresponding to the location of the cancer on diagnostic images. • Among all 120 interval cancers with an AI score of 10, 21% (25/120) were classified as a false negative or minimal sign significant and had AI markings matching the cancer location, suggesting they may be visible on prior screening. • Most of the correctly located interval cancers matched only in one view, and the majority were classified as either true negative or minimal sign non-specific, indicating low potential for being detected earlier in a real screening setting.

• Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Aged / Artificial Intelligence / Breast / Breast cancer / Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging / Cancer / Diagnostic Radiology / Diagnostic systems / Early Detection of Cancer - methods / Female / Humans / Imaging / Internal Medicine / Interventional Radiology / Mammography / Mammography - methods / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Middle Aged / Neuroradiology / Norway - epidemiology / Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods / Radiology / Retrospective Studies / Ultrasound