MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results
Journal Article

Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
INTRODUCTION Factors underlying discordant visual and quantitative amyloid beta–positron emission tomography (Aβ‐PET) results and their clinical implications are not well understood. METHODS Participants from the 1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (1FLADRC) underwent Aβ‐PET, blood draw, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neuropsychological testing. We evaluated differences in demographics, apolipoprotein E (APOE) status, biomarkers, and cognition among older adults with concordant and discordant visual‐quantitative Aβ‐PET. Discordance was defined as positive visual read (V) of Aβ‐PET with below‐threshold Centiloid quantification (Q; CL <25; V+/Q–) or negative visual read with CL ≥25 (V–/Q+). RESULTS We studied 386 participants (mean age ± SD: 70.7 ± 7.8, 55.2% female, 44.6% Hispanic White). Compared to V+/Q–, V–/Q+ had a higher frequency of APOE ε4 carriers (40%). Black/African American participants were overrepresented in V–/Q+ (40.9%). Both discordant groups had higher plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p‐tau217) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) than V–/Q– but lower than V+/Q+. Discordant groups had greater gray matter volume and better cognitive performance than V+/Q+. DISCUSSION Discordant Aβ‐PET findings likely hold clinical significance and may reflect early stages of neuropathological progression. Highlights Groups with concordant/discordant visual‐quantitative amyloid beta–positron emission tomography (Aβ‐PET) results were compared. Visual–/quant+ were more likely than visual+/quant– to be apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 carriers and Black/African American. Discordant groups had higher plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p‐tau217) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) than concordant negative. Discordant groups had less atrophy and better cognition than concordant positive. Centiloid quantification should supplement visual reads in clinical settings.