MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases
Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases
Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases
Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases
Journal Article

Episiotomy is associated with a reduced risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous vacuum‐assisted deliveries, particularly in high‐risk cases

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Introduction Vacuum‐assisted delivery is a major risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), yet agreement is lacking on whether mediolateral episiotomy mitigates risk. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether episiotomy during vacuum‐assisted delivery in nulliparous women affects the risk of OASI and to identify subgroups who may benefit from it. Material and Methods A retrospective cohort study including all nulliparous singleton pregnancies delivered by vacuum‐assisted delivery at a tertiary center (January 2011–December 2022). Twin deliveries and multiparous women were excluded. Mediolateral episiotomy was performed according to the physician's preference and clinical judgment. The primary outcome was the risk of OASI. The diagnosis of OASI was based on a clinical assessment immediately after delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between mediolateral episiotomy and OASI while adjusting for potential confounders: maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, gestational age, prolonged second stage, occiput posterior, and epidural analgesia. Results Among 7951 vacuum‐assisted deliveries, 7201 (90.6%) had an episiotomy and 750 (9.4%) did not. The groups were similar, though episiotomy cases more often had a prolonged second stage (32.0% vs 25.9%, p = 0.001), occiput posterior (12.7% vs 9.6%, p = 0.03), and birthweight ≥3500 g (25.4% vs 21.7%, p = 0.03). OASI occurred twice as often without episiotomy (2.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.01). After adjustment, episiotomy remained (adjusted odds ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.70). The number needed to treat (NNT) with episiotomy to prevent one OASI was 64 overall, and was lower in the presence of intrapartum risk factors: 16 with prolonged second stage, 33 with occiput posterior, and 27 when birthweight exceeded 3500 g. Postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion occurred more frequently with episiotomy (3.9% vs 1.5%; p = 0.001), corresponding to a number needed to harm (NNH) of 43. Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly. Conclusions In nulliparous women, mediolateral episiotomy during vacuum‐assisted delivery was associated with a 50% reduction in OASI. The preventive effect of mediolateral episiotomy was greater when multiple intrapartum risk factors were present. Mediolateral episiotomy during vacuum‐assisted delivery in nulliparous women was associated with lower obstetric anal sphincter injury (1.4% vs 2.8%; adjusted odds ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.70). The protective effect was greater when intrapartum risk factors were present, including prolonged second stage, occiput posterior position, and birthweight ≥3500 g.