Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Does transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifact impact on diagnostic performance? An intra-patient comparison of extracellular gadolinium versus gadoxetic acid
by
Belmonte, Ernest
, Caparroz Carla
, Llarch Neus
, Rimola Jordi
, ner Alejandro
, Ayuso, Carmen
, Darnell, Anna
, Sapena Victor
, Reig, Maria
, Bruix Jordi
in
Acids
/ Contrast agents
/ Contrast media
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Gadolinium
/ Image contrast
/ Image enhancement
/ Image quality
/ Liver
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical imaging
/ Quality assessment
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Does transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifact impact on diagnostic performance? An intra-patient comparison of extracellular gadolinium versus gadoxetic acid
by
Belmonte, Ernest
, Caparroz Carla
, Llarch Neus
, Rimola Jordi
, ner Alejandro
, Ayuso, Carmen
, Darnell, Anna
, Sapena Victor
, Reig, Maria
, Bruix Jordi
in
Acids
/ Contrast agents
/ Contrast media
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Gadolinium
/ Image contrast
/ Image enhancement
/ Image quality
/ Liver
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical imaging
/ Quality assessment
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Does transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifact impact on diagnostic performance? An intra-patient comparison of extracellular gadolinium versus gadoxetic acid
by
Belmonte, Ernest
, Caparroz Carla
, Llarch Neus
, Rimola Jordi
, ner Alejandro
, Ayuso, Carmen
, Darnell, Anna
, Sapena Victor
, Reig, Maria
, Bruix Jordi
in
Acids
/ Contrast agents
/ Contrast media
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Gadolinium
/ Image contrast
/ Image enhancement
/ Image quality
/ Liver
/ Magnetic resonance imaging
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Medical imaging
/ Quality assessment
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Does transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifact impact on diagnostic performance? An intra-patient comparison of extracellular gadolinium versus gadoxetic acid
Journal Article
Does transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifact impact on diagnostic performance? An intra-patient comparison of extracellular gadolinium versus gadoxetic acid
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectiveTo compare the frequency of transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts in liver MRI after extracellular gadolinium and gadoxetic acid injection, and to determine the impact of these artifacts on the detection of focal areas of enhancement on arterial-phase images.Materials and methodsIntra-patient comparison of 82 cirrhotic patients who prospectively underwent liver MR with extracellular gadolinium and with gadoxetic acid within 1 month. Two readers independently assessed the quality of dynamic T1-weighted MR images (pre-contrast, arterial, and portal-venous phases), rating respiratory-motion-related artifacts on four-point scale (0 [none]–3 [non-diagnostic]). We dichotomized these assessments, which were compared using McNemar’s test, defining transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts as a study with a pre-contrast score < 2 and arterial-phase score ≥ 2. Readers also recorded whether at least one focal area of enhancement ≥ 10 mm on arterial phase was present.ResultsThe quality of arterial-phase images was worse when obtained after gadoxetic acid than after extracellular gadolinium (p < 0.01), and transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts were more common after gadoxetic acid than after extracellular gadolinium (p < 0.02). At least one area of arterial-phase enhancement ≥ 10 mm was detected more often after extracellular gadolinium than after gadoxetic acid. We observed significant differences on the comparison of the distributions of the presence of arterial-phase artifacts against the presence of arterial-phase enhancement ≥ 10 mm between the two contrast agents (p < 0.0001).ConclusionIn cirrhotic patients, transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts are more common after gadoxetic acid than after extracellular gadolinium. Worse detection of arterial-phase enhancement on gadoxetic acid is only partly due to these artifacts.Key Points• In a patient-by-patient analysis, the quality of arterial-phase liver MR images was significantly worse with gadoxetic acid than with extracellular gadolinium.• The frequency of transient arterial-phase artifacts was significantly higher after gadoxetic acid injection than after extracellular gadolinium injection.• Differences in the detection of areas of arterial-phase enhancement between MRI studies done with extracellular gadolinium and those done with gadoxetic acid might not be related only to image quality.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.