Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Shots at goal in Australian Football: Historical trends, determinants of accuracy and common strategies
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Shots at goal in Australian Football: Historical trends, determinants of accuracy and common strategies
Do you wish to request the book?
Shots at goal in Australian Football: Historical trends, determinants of accuracy and common strategies
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Shots at goal in Australian Football: Historical trends, determinants of accuracy and common strategies
2024
Overview
To understand the historical context of and relationships between, the characteristics of shots at goal and match outcome in the Australian Football League.
Observational.
Descriptive statistics of shots at goal were calculated and compared across 20 seasons. The location, type, and outcome of all shots at goal (n = 43,254), by all teams (2017–19 & 21), were compared with match outcome.
The total number of shots per match and the accuracy of shots haven't changed in two decades. Most teams win by having more shots at goal (Wilcoxon-r effect size 0.63) than their opponent (i.e. “majority strategy”) and of these, the number of open shots (0.48) is slightly more important than set shots (0.43), followed by shot accuracy (0.29). However, some teams (14 %) win by taking fewer shots at goal from field locations with a higher likelihood of scoring a goal (i.e. “minority strategy”). Arc angle and shot type can be used to predict the outcome of a shot at goal with 60.3 % classification accuracy. The novel shot-outcome prediction model reported here provides a better opportunity to evaluate goal kicking performance of teams and players, because it accounts for the type and difficulty of the shot.
Teams can evaluate the shot accuracy of their players more fairly, by accounting for shot location using the method reported here. Coaches can compare the two shot strategies identified and implement the one that suits the skill profile of their players and increase their likelihood of winning.
