Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Nectar-Secreting and Nectarless Epidendrum: Structure of the Inner Floral Spur
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Nectar-Secreting and Nectarless Epidendrum: Structure of the Inner Floral Spur
Do you wish to request the book?
Nectar-Secreting and Nectarless Epidendrum: Structure of the Inner Floral Spur
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Nectar-Secreting and Nectarless Epidendrum: Structure of the Inner Floral Spur
2018
Overview
, the largest genus of Neotropical orchids, contains both nectar-secreting and nectarless species. Here, we compare the fine structure of the inner floral spur, termed the cuniculus, in nectariferous (
,
) and seemingly nectarless (
,
,
) species. This is the first time for such a detailed investigation of cuniculus structure to be undertaken for
Our aim was to characterize features indicative of secretory activity and to ascertain whether flowers presumed to be nectarless produce alternative pollinator food-rewards. The cuniculus is formed by fusion of the basal part of the labellum and column and extends alongside the ovary and transmitting tract. Our study indicates that all investigated species produce nectar or nectar-like secretion to varying degrees, and no alternative pollinator food-rewards were observed. Even though macroscopic investigation of presumed rewardless species failed to reveal the presence of secretion within the cuniculus, close observations of the cells lining the cuniculus by LM, SEM, and TEM revealed the presence of cuticular blisters and surface material. Moreover, the similarity of both the thick tangential cell walls (with the exception of
) and organelle complement of cuniculus epidermal cells in both copiously nectariferous species and those producing only small quantities of surface secretion confirmed the presence of secretory activity in species generally regarded to be rewardless. The secretory character was particularly obvious in the cells of the cuniculus of
but also in
and
since electron-dense cytoplasm and mitochondria, ER and secretory vesicles were abundant. Furthermore, cell wall protuberances occurred in
, which was indicative of intense transmembrane transport. This investigation highlights the need to examine more closely whether
spp. considered to lack food-rewards based solely on macroscopic examination really are rewardless and deceptive.
