Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The forgotten half of scientific thinking
by
Scheffer, Marten
in
Association Learning - physiology
/ Cognition - physiology
/ Creativity
/ Humans
/ incubation
/ Material resilience
/ Mind
/ OPINION
/ Science
/ Sustainability science
/ Thinking
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The forgotten half of scientific thinking
by
Scheffer, Marten
in
Association Learning - physiology
/ Cognition - physiology
/ Creativity
/ Humans
/ incubation
/ Material resilience
/ Mind
/ OPINION
/ Science
/ Sustainability science
/ Thinking
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The forgotten half of scientific thinking
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Although thinking is the core business of scientists, we rarely ponder how it thrives best; this is ironic, as there is abundant scientific insight to draw upon. For example, it is now known that thinking has two complementary modes: roughly, association versus reasoning (1). We systematically underestimate the role of the first (1), and the way our institutions, meetings, and teaching are organized heavily reflects this imbalance. By contrast, many of the greatest scientists systematically nurtured a balanced dual-thinking process. We should follow their example and reform scientific practice and education to catalyze the unusual combinations of knowledge that often turn out to have the highest impact (2).
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences,National Acad Sciences
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.