MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes
Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes
Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes
Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes
Journal Article

Laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of short-term and long-term outcomes

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background The oncologic safety of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer (SCRC), a distinct high-risk subgroup, remains under-investigated. This study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for SCRC. Methods A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 178 consecutive patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for SCRC between June 2007 and April 2019 was performed. To balance baseline covariates for the primary analysis, overlap weighting (OW) was applied to the cohort (133 laparoscopic, 45 open). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted as a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results In the primary OW analysis, the laparoscopic group showed significantly less estimated blood loss (median, 100 mL vs. 200 mL; P  = 0.003) and shorter time to first liquid diet (median, 4 vs. 5 days; P  = 0.005) than the open surgery group. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of 5-year OS (75.1% vs. 62.8%; P  = 0.088) or 5-year DFS (65.69% vs. 59.3%; P  = 0.110). Furthermore, in the multivariable Cox analysis, the laparoscopic approach was not an independent predictor of OS (adjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35–1.06) or DFS (adjusted HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41–1.18). These findings were consistent in the PSM sensitivity analysis. Conclusions In this study, laparoscopic-assisted surgery for SCRC offered improved short-term outcomes while maintaining long-term oncologic safety.