Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Multi-criteria assessment of optimization methods for controlling renewable energy sources in distribution systems
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Multi-criteria assessment of optimization methods for controlling renewable energy sources in distribution systems
Do you wish to request the book?
Multi-criteria assessment of optimization methods for controlling renewable energy sources in distribution systems
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Multi-criteria assessment of optimization methods for controlling renewable energy sources in distribution systems
2025
Overview
Numerous optimization techniques have recently been employed in the literature to enhance various electric power systems. Optimization algorithms help system operators determine the optimal location and capacity of any renewable energy source (RES) connected to a system, enabling them to achieve a specific goal and improve its performance. This study presents a novel statistical evaluation of 20 famous metaheuristic optimization techniques based on 10 performance measures. The performance measures comprise five power loss indices, three voltage profile indices, load flow calling frequency, and execution time. The evaluation involves 10 distribution systems of varying sizes to ensure an equitable comparison of the algorithm. The Friedman Ranking method evaluates algorithms based on performance metrics, yielding a specific score. Upon modeling all distribution systems, a composite ranking methodology is employed to categorize the algorithms into only four categories: excellent, very good, good, and fair. The study finalizes the ranking of all algorithms according to their overall assessment. The AEO, GWO, JS, PSO, MVO, BO, and GNDO algorithms attain ranks below 25%, thereby placing them in the highest category. The ALO, DA, FPA, SSA, YAYA, and SPO algorithms fall into the second category, with rankings ranging from 25 to 50%. The SMA and CGO algorithms are classified in the third group, with rankings between 50 and 75%. The analysis ultimately reveals that the algorithms CStA, HHO, AOA, GOA, and AOS are positioned in the lowest group, each achieving rankings beyond 75%. As comparison case studies, the proposed algorithms achieved a power loss of 87.164 kW for the 33-bus system, which is less than or equal to the published work. The same result is achieved with the 69-bus system, which has a power loss of 71.644 kW for most of the studied algorithms. Using the appropriate algorithms with distribution systems saves time and effort for the system operator, enhances performance, and increases the usability of optimization algorithms.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
