Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Linking clinical complaints and objective measures of disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy type 1
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Linking clinical complaints and objective measures of disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy type 1
Do you wish to request the book?
Linking clinical complaints and objective measures of disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy type 1
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Linking clinical complaints and objective measures of disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy type 1
2022
Overview
Abstract
Study Objectives
Despite its high frequency in narcolepsy type 1(NT1), disrupted nocturnal sleep (DNS) remains understudied, and its determinants have been poorly assessed. We aimed to determine the clinical, polysomnographic (PSG), and biological variables associated with DNS in a large sample of patients with NT1, and to evaluate the effect of medication on DNS and its severity.
Methods
Two hundred and forty-eight consecutive adult patients with NT1 (145 untreated, 103 treated) were included at the National Reference Center for Narcolepsy-France; 51 drug-free patients were reevaluated during treatment. DNS, assessed with the Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), was categorized in four levels (absent, mild, moderate, severe). Clinical characteristics, validated questionnaires, PSG parameters (sleep fragmentation markers: sleep (SB) and wake bouts (WB), transitions), objective sleepiness, and orexin-A levels were assessed.
Results
In drug-free patients, DNS severity was associated with higher scores on NSS, higher sleepiness, anxiety/depressive symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, worse quality of life (QoL). Patients with moderate/severe DNS (59%) had increased sleep onset REM periods, lower sleep efficiency, longer wake after sleep onset, more N1, SB, WB, sleep instability, transitions. In treated patients, DNS was associated with the same clinical data, and antidepressant use; but only with longer REM sleep latency on PSG. During treatment, sleepiness, NSS scores, depressive symptoms decreased, as well as total sleep time, WB, SB, transitions. DNS improved in 55% of patients, without predictors except more baseline anxiety.
Conclusion
DNS complaint is frequent in NT1, associated with disease severity based on NSS, several PSG parameters, and objective sleepiness in untreated and treated conditions. DNS improves with treatment. We advocate the systematic assessment of this symptom and its inclusion in NT1 management strategy.
