MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Journal Article

Comparative Effectiveness of Peripheral Angioplasty Strategies for 1-Year Restenosis in Lower Limb Artery Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background: Optimal endovascular strategy for lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains debated, particularly regarding 1-year restenosis. Aim: To evaluate the association between drug-coated balloon (DCB)-based angioplasty and 1-year restenosis compared with stent-based and plain balloon strategies in a real-world PAD cohort. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 283 consecutive patients (mean age 67.5 ± 11.2 years, 79% male) undergoing lower limb angioplasty between 2010 and 2023. Patients were treated with one of five strategies: direct stent, pre-dilatation + stent, stent + post-dilatation, DCB ± bailout stent, or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Restenosis at 12 months (≥50% diameter reduction on Doppler, CT angiography, or angiography) was the primary endpoint. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression adjusted for clinical and lesion characteristics were used. The prespecified main comparison was DCB ± stent versus non-DCB strategies. Results: Overall, 1-year restenosis occurred in 81 patients (28.7%). Restenosis rates were 15.4% with DCB ± stent versus 34.2%, 29.8%, 31.5%, and 38.1% with direct stent, pre-dilatation + stent, stent + post-dilatation, and POBA, respectively (p = 0.004). In adjusted analysis, DCB ± stent was associated with a lower hazard of restenosis compared with direct stent (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31–0.87), whereas POBA was associated with a higher hazard versus DCB ± stent (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.01–3.53). Periprocedural complication rates were low and similar across groups (overall 6.3%). Conclusions: In this real-world PAD cohort, DCB-based angioplasty was independently associated with lower 1-year restenosis compared with stent-based and plain balloon strategies, without an excess of procedural complications. Given the observational design and lesion-driven strategy selection, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating but support broader use of DCB in appropriately selected lesions.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks