Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Shape-model scaling is more robust than linear scaling to marker placement error
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Shape-model scaling is more robust than linear scaling to marker placement error
Do you wish to request the book?
Shape-model scaling is more robust than linear scaling to marker placement error
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Shape-model scaling is more robust than linear scaling to marker placement error
2023
Overview
When reconstructing bone geometry to calculate joint kinematics, shape-model scaling can be more accurate and repeatable than linear scaling given the same anatomical landmarks. This study perturbed anatomical landmarks from optical motion capture and determined the robustness of shape-model scaling to misplaced markers compared to a traditional approach of linear scaling. We hypothesised that shape-model scaling would be less susceptible to variance in marker positions compared to linear scaling. The positions of hip joint centres and femoral/tibial segment lengths across perturbations were compared to determine each scaling method’s range of geometric variation. The standard deviation (SD) of the hip joint centre location from the shape model had a maximum of 1.4 mm, compared to 4.2 mm for linear scaling. Femoral and tibial segments displayed SD’s of 5.4 mm and 5.2 mm when shape-model scaled, compared to 9.2 mm and 9.5 mm with linear scaling, respectively, thus supporting our hypothesis. Geometric constraints within a shape model provide robustness to marker misplacement providing potential improvements in repeatability and data exchange.
